AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Thalia Prum

NUT153 · NUTR153 · NUTR150 · NUTR155 · NUTR170 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid if you have any alternative; expect , and limited help.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderGroup Project OverloadDisorganized OnlineTrick QuestionsZero Take-Again
  • 0% would-take-again signals broad dissatisfaction across formats
  • Online work is heavy on , and
  • Grades demand full reading and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earn A's, but many report full effort for a C because .

Both online and ; online adds group-credit risk.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

GE nutrition content is manageable, but volume of , and trick questions raise the bar.

Online group logistics and person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Participation, group daily contact, and .

Online forces daily group contact; in-person also stresses participation and attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Would-take-again is effectively zero and .

Negative recommendation is strong in both online and in-person recent reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and reports of full work for low grades show little leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and frequent tests.

Format shift

Online workload is especially group-heavy; and projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students call the course messy, unhelpful, and poorly explained despite occasional enthusiasm.

Format shift

Online organization complaints are strongest; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and several non-cumulative or cumulative exams.

Format shift

Online leans group work plus tests; and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews still warn of , and uneven help, with a few older positives.

Main concern

Exams can feel trick-based and .

What students said

“Said that she " so its important to memorize small details and #'s.”
NUTR170
“She gave me a D on the assignment because it wasn't detailed enough.”
NUTR150
“ .”
NUTR150

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report forced rotating , and messy Blackboard structure.

Main concern

Group members can submit early and leave you with zero credit.

What students said

“ . She picks the groups & they change every assignment.”
NUTR150
“ ! If you have a job or a !”
NUTR150
“ and all assignments are group projects!”
NUTR153

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams reward tiny details and book reading; some students say she enjoys tricking test-takers.

Trick QuestionsMultiple ChoiceSaturday Tests OnlineBook-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and vague study guides; re-takes mentioned in one older review.

Trick QuestionsBook-Based ExamsVague Study Guides
“Said that she " so its important to memorize small details and #'s.”
NUTR170
“You literally have to read the entire textbook if you want to do well as all of the .”
NUTR153

Online

Long quizzes and Saturday-only tests; no student-friendly proctoring notes beyond schedule rigidity.

Saturday-Only TestsLong QuizzesMultiple Choice
“ ! If you have a job or a !”
NUTR150
“3 test and a ”
NUTR155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She picks the groups & they change every assignment. Expects you to talk with your group daily.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, , and zero take-again sentiment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“This professor is by far the . Without a doubt.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“ and all assignments are group projects!”

⚖️

22/100

“I completed 100% of assignments and still managed to get a C.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her course is a mess. I could write a and concise syllabus any day.
  • She's all over the place .
  • Very enthusiastic about her field.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She likes .
  • I took this class thinking it was going to be a piece of cake. Turns out I was wrong.

Theme 3

👥 About Group Work

  • !
  • Groups can & will turn in assignments 5 days early w/out you, so you get no credit.
  • There are 3 group projects which is pretty challenging to achieve effectively in an online class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

18 detailed reviews with balanced online and in-person counts and a flat 0% take-again rate give solid medium-high confidence.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

NUTR1508 reviews
NUTR1533 reviews
NUTR1553 reviews
1502 reviews
NUT1531 review
Show 1 more courses
NUTR1701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1