AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Theodore Enns

MATH121 · MATH141 · MATH46 · MATH96 · MATH98 · MATH95 · MATH254 · MATH122 · MATH116 · MATH150 · MATH151 · MATH119 · CALC141 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you already know the math and can teach yourself from the book and study guides.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor lecturerTeach yourselfTest heavyHard to followAvoid if weak at math
  • Lectures are ; most students say
  • Grades rest almost entirely on a
  • Nice guy personally but widely rated a poor math teacher

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A few strong students pass with study guides, but , and many Ds, Fs, and drops.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material feels harder because lectures are superficial or .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory or warn that and failing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

and most comments urge students to pick another professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Exam-only grading, limited partial credit, and .

Format shift

In-person only; structure is usually three or .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Homework is often optional or unchecked, but the .

Format shift

; pressure is on exams not daily busywork.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students say he mumbles to the board, makes mistakes, rushes, and .

Format shift

Consistent in-person complaints about lecture quality over many years.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Course grades are driven almost entirely by a small set of tests and a .

Format shift

In-person reviews repeatedly describe exam-only grading with lowest test dropped.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and confusing; students pass mainly by self-study, tutors, and while many struggle or drop.

Main concern

, and little help leave weak math students failing.

What students said

“The class was basically me teaching myself which isn't the . .”
MATH121
“This professor overexplains making simple mathematical concepts complicated. .”
MATH46
“RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!!!”
MATH121

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

examples, with strict methods and limited partial credit.

Exam HeavyHard TestsLittle Partial CreditStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Typically three or ; lowest dropped; problems often harder than practice and partial credit is slim.

4 Exams Lowest DroppedHarder Than HomeworkLittle Partial CreditStudy Guides
“His tests were only 10 questions long, 4 tests per semester, lowest grade is dropped... They were a lot harder and partial credit was slim”
MATH121
“For grades, he ONLY grades you by the 3 tests and . He will knock off the lowest test”
MATH119

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class was basically me teaching myself which isn't the . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting weak lectures and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

22/100

“he pretty much speaks how your textbook is read and doesnt change throughout the semester”

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

“this is my suggestion : !!!...”

📝

30/100

“ . If you have any difficulties with .”

🧠

25/100

“You then have too self teach for the rest of the semester or get a tutor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • mumbles towards board
  • Faces the board the whole time
  • Very hard to understand..stumbles over his words alot makes alot of mistakes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a , and runs through all the lessons extremely fast
  • on one test only 2 people past
  • If you are not good a math and you are really trying to pass the class at least with a C this is not the professor for you

Theme 3

⚠️ About Avoidance

  • RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!!!
  • look for another person that because he doesn't do it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews over many years consistently describe weak teaching and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 56
3 out of 59
2 out of 516
1 out of 520

Course coverage

MATH9611 reviews
MATH12110 reviews
MATH1195 reviews
MATH1164 reviews
MATH1513 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH463 reviews
952 reviews
MATH952 reviews
MATH982 reviews
04704320551 review
1161 review
1191 review
CALC1411 review
MATH1221 review
MATH1411 review
MATH1501 review
MATH2541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1