AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Adrienne Dines

PERG120 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

better for organized students who follow directions closely, especially if not .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing online experienceOrganized for someHarsh on small mistakesUnclear feedback for othersTest heavy weeks
  • Only five reviews with a sharp split between glowing and frustrated students.
  • In-person comments lean organized and helpful; online comments .
  • Grades can still be high if you do the work, but midterm and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Several students earned As, but harsh grading on small mistakes and takes careful work.

Online reviews stress harsh or ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Personal growth content is not described as intellectually brutal, but workload and .

Online students report higher difficulty than the more positive in-person pair.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, so flexibility is not well established.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Roughly half the and half is negative, matching the polarized comments.

Online reviews drive the split; in-person comments are more positive but sparse.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tags and , and unclear standards for some online students.

Format shift

Strictness complaints are mainly from online reviews; in-person comments are more positive.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Do-the-work-on-time guidance fits a moderate load, with some students warning about heavy midterm and .

Format shift

Workload stress is mentioned more in online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Praise for organization and support sits next to complaints that explanations and feedback confuse students.

Format shift

In-person teaching comments are stronger; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assignments, midterms, and at least one student.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe an them succeed.

Main concern

High expectations require timely work and effort.

What students said

“Just do the work on time and you will learn how to succeed in college. and she replies to questions quickly.”
PERG120
“ . She had high expectations, but they helped me reach my goals for the course.”
PERG120

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one strong recommendation for accessibility and on small mistakes, and heavy test weeks.

Main concern

and slow or harsh feedback for some online students.

What students said

“Enjoyed this class. !”
PERG120
“Horrible explainer, then when I asked for clarification, she .”
PERG120
“ . Does not give feed back as too why something is marked down.”
PERG120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention midterms and finals week intensity but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Midterms and finals week workloadTest heavy tagsUnclear grading feedback online

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on organization and high expectations rather than specific exam security or format details.

High expectationsOrganized course structure
“She had high expectations, but they helped me reach my goals for the course.”
PERG120

Online

Online comments note heavy work during midterms and finals and .

Midterms and finals week workloadTest heavyTough grader
“Be prepared for a lot of and finals week.”
PERG120
“ but she is harsh on little mistakes.”
PERG120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do the work on time and you will learn how to succeed in college. and she replies to questions quickly. AWESOME professor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting the and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Polarized Experience

50/100

“ .”

📋 Organization Praise

70/100

“ and she replies to questions quickly.”

📝

30/100

“ . Does not give feed back as too why something is marked down.”

🎯 High Expectations

60/100

“She had high expectations, but they helped me reach my goals for the course.”

Theme 1

👍 Positive Experiences

  • !
  • AWESOME professor!
  • .

Theme 2

👎 Frustrations

  • Horrible explainer
  • harsh on little mistakes
  • Do not expect .

Theme 3

📈 Workload and Grades

  • Be prepared for a lot of and finals week.
  • Just do the work on time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews with polarized opinions and limited detail reduce confidence despite some concrete grade and format notes.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PERG1205 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values