AI Rate Professor

Health Information Technology

Connie Renda

HIMS455 · HEIT110 · HEIT156 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will show up, join group work, and follow directions carefully; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDedicated InstructorGroup ProjectsMandatory AttendanceKnowledgeableParticipation Matters
  • Most students praise her energy, industry knowledge, and dedication in health information courses.
  • and quiz instructions plus strict participation and .
  • Workload is reading- and project-heavy rather than pure exam chaos, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A , and participation, but missing work or late class quickly hurts.

All evidence is in person across four reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is manageable with guidance, though reading, research, and .

In-person only; difficulty ratings range from easy to moderately hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and missing or late class lowers the grade.

In-person only.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Three of four reviews are strongly positive on .

In-person only; newer advanced course review is more critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Called a , though participation and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and active participation rather than a light pass.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

82/100

Students highlight dedication, industry expertise, energy, and help that makes tough material enjoyable.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Projects, participation, quizzes, and .

Format shift

In-person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person HIT courses are praised for expert teaching and energy, with one critique of and grade hits for missed participation or class.

Main concern

and quiz instructions plus attendance-linked grading can frustrate some students.

What students said

“An amazing teacher. Great energy, and very personal.”
HEIT156
“The instructions for quiz are not clear either.”
HIMS455
“Ms. Renda is an excellent and very highly dedicated instructor.”
HEIT110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize quizzes, projects, and participation .

QuizzesGroup ProjectsParticipation Graded

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation with limited exam-policy detail.

QuizzesGroup ProjectsParticipation
“The instructions for quiz are not clear either.”
HIMS455
“ as is attendance”
HEIT110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor knows her stuff! She made me actually enjoy the tough aspects in the course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews with . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Ms. Renda is an excellent and very highly dedicated instructor.”

📋 Process Clarity

40/100

“The instructions for quiz are not clear either.”

👍 Overall Value

68/100

“An amazing teacher. Great energy, and very personal.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has extensive knowledge and years of experience in Health Information Management.
  • and knowledgeable! Just wonderful!
  • Great energy, and very personal.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • If .
  • There is a lot of reading and researched to do, participation is very important.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews over several years, mostly positive but , so confidence is moderate.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HEIT1562 reviews
HEIT1101 review
HIMS4551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1