AI Rate Professor

Business

Ladan Moshiri

CBTE128 · CBTE177 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from the textbook; but evidence is thin.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing By FormatZero Instruction OnlineInconsistent GradingTextbook-Only Workflow
  • Online reviews hammer disorganization, rudeness, and no real teaching.
  • The and calls her highly recommendable.
  • Grading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Reported grades include B+, B, and A+, but inconsistent criteria mean effort does not reliably map to an A.

Online grades and complaints conflict; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings are modest, and work is largely textbook-driven rather than conceptually brutal.

Both formats describe application-style assignments more than deep theory.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly establish an .

Neither online nor in-person comments clearly prove mandatory or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Three of four reviews say no, citing rudeness, no teaching, and .

; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students say she ignores her own criteria and punishes tool mismatches not stated clearly.

Format shift

Harsh grading complaints are online-only; and .

Workload

Light

58/100

Work is mostly textbook lessons and deliverables .

Format shift

Online frames it as turn-the-crank textbook work; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Majority describe zero instruction, disorganization, and .

Format shift

Online teaching scores are 1-2; the only in-person review is a 5.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on textbook lessons, software deliverables, and assignment submission.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One , and highly recommended.

Main concern

, so the glow may not generalize.

What students said

“Prof Moshiri did not make the class hard, she made it easy for you to learn!”
CBTE177

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report disorganization, arrogance, no instruction, and .

Main concern

Unclear software and tools.

What students said

“Disorganized. Irresponsible. Rude. Lack of teaching skill.”
CBTE128
“Zero instruction -- just turn the crank on the Lessons in the textbook”
CBTE177
“ .”
CBTE177

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely discuss exams and focus on assignment deliverables and .

Assignment-DrivenSoftware Deliverables

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence emphasizes assignments and .

Assignments EarlyExtra Credit
“Key to taking her course is, do the assignments early, and ask questions.”
CBTE177

Online

Online comments do not clearly prove exam format; .

Assignment Software Confusion
“Had to use a separate program in addition to Adobe because she said Adobe Standard or Pro was fine which was not the case.”
CBTE177

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Disorganized. Irresponsible. Rude. Lack of teaching skill. Lack of knowledge.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (3 online, 1 in person), contrasting harsh online critiques with . Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Collapse Online

30/100

“Zero instruction -- just turn the crank on the Lessons in the textbook”

👎 Recommendation Split

28/100

“ .”

⚖️

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lack of teaching skill
  • A remarkable combination of laziness and arrogance
  • she made it easy for you to learn

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you were punished for not

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews from 2017-2020 show a sharp online-versus-in-person split, so but sample size is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CBTE1773 reviews
CBTE1281 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values