AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Karen Douglas

MATH116 · MATH96 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can learn fully from the textbook and outside help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderLecture heavyReads from textbookUnenthusiasticNitpicky quizzes
  • Most recent MATH96 reviews describe and .
  • .
  • Almost no students would take .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and limited partial credit make a high grade require careful, error-free work.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is moderate, but .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly all recent students say they would not take her again due to weak teaching and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and docking for tiny details.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and tests, but not described as an overwhelming pile of work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students say , and often just follow the textbook.

Format shift

One very old positive MATH116 review contrasts with recent MATH96 complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Quizzes and sets.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MATH reviews emphasize weak lectures, tough quiz grading, and .

Main concern

Unclear lectures and is correct.

What students said

“Her lectures were lacking and not flexible in the slightest.”
MATH96
“She reads straight off the textbook and does not offer alternative ways to solve math problems.”
MATH96
“Extremely rude to students who attempt to correct her mistakes.”
MATH96

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

little student-friendly exam flexibility described.

Quiz heavyIn-person quizzesPicky point deductions

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews describe heavy quiz use in class with picky scoring and little flexibility.

Quiz heavyTough graderIn-person assessments
“She spent most of the class doing quizzes and was extremely unenthusiastic.”
MATH96
“She was also extremely picky about quizzes nitpicking small details and .”
MATH96

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you struggle with math as I do, and can't understand the wall of gibberish that is a math textbook, you will hate this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2011-2020, weighted toward recent MATH96 feedback. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Lecture Clarity

28/100

“She reads straight off the textbook and does not offer alternative ways to solve math problems.”

⚖️

22/100

“She as incorrect even if it was correct.”

👎

12/100

“Terrible. Expects you to understand her drawings instead of explaining.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were lacking and not flexible in the slightest.
  • She reads straight off the textbook and does not offer alternative ways to solve math problems.
  • Present irrelevant information.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She was
  • Getting help for outside sources was a must for me to just barely pass this class.

Theme 3

😤 About Classroom Climate

  • Extremely rude to students who attempt to correct her mistakes.
  • She was also extremely unenthusiastic.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews with consistent recent complaints, but a sparse sample and one very old positive outlier lower confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH963 reviews
MATH1161 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values