AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Brian Gulino

CISC190 · ENG101 · CISC181 · CS101 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Skip if ; only consider if you already know the material and just need the credit.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesNice but unclearSparse grading updatesFew testsOffice hours needed
  • Students call him nice but and in lecture.
  • Assignments and ; many rely on office hours or self-study.
  • ; several warn against taking him if you want real learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Several students report you can get an A with self-study and staying on top of .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is intro-level CS/Office tools, but poor delivery makes it feel harder than the material itself.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, while others said attendance was not required.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and most comments urge self-teaching or choosing someone else.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and picky assignment style, yet multiple As reported with effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

, and occasional busy work rather than constant heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Repeatedly described as nice but , and and grading.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Very few tests; grade hinges on assignments and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, late grade updates, and uneven guidance; a few students still got As with self-study.

Main concern

and little guidance leave beginners lost.

What students said

“ . You won't know where you stand grade-wise in the class until maybe a week before the end of the semester.”
CISC181
“He would answer his phone calls in the middle of class, and he only graded maybe one or .”
CISC190
“ and essentially pointless.”
CISC181

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are sparse; success depends more on doing assignments his way than on heavy testing.

Few testsAssignment-heavyDelayed grade updates

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report few tests and .

Few testsAssignment-focusedLittle study guidance
“ and there but if u stay on top of things u will pass procrastinating will not help you pass.”
CISC181
“Make sure to do things his way or else you'll .”
CISC181

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice guy, however... and essentially pointless.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews, highlighting disorganization, unclear lectures, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“his lectures are short, and pointless for most things.”

👎 Recommendation Signal

22/100

“ business degrees”

📚

70/100

“Everything I learned was on YouTube, because he doesn't know how to use the programs he is supposed to teach.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are short and to the point.
  • lectures are very hard to understand

Theme 2

📂

  • Never updates grades so you don't know if you're doing well
  • only graded maybe one or two assignments

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • He's a nice guy, though
  • Brian is a great guy
  • Professor Gulino is a straight shooter

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews over several years with consistent themes on disorganization, but older dates and some low-detail posts limit certainty.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CISC18111 reviews
CISC1901 review
CS1011 review
ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3