AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jim Weinrich

PSY258 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

one student found him nice but , and stuck with a disliked textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesWordy TextbookToo WordyNice But Ineffective
  • Only one review, and it is strongly negative on lecture style and textbook.
  • Students find lectures and the assigned text unnecessarily long and dull.
  • He is described as a nice person, but teaching delivery fails to engage.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

No grade outcomes are shared, so effort needed for an A .

Only one in-person review; no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty is rated moderate, but comments focus on boredom and length rather than concept hardness.

Only one in-person review; no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The .

review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The and warns lectures and the book are poor.

Recommendation is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

the single review.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload details are sparse; complaints focus on lengthy lectures and textbook reading.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Student found him very boring and .

Format shift

Teaching judgment rests on a single in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review does not clearly state whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person review calls lectures and the textbook overly long and boring, while .

Main concern

and a disliked textbook with little evidence of engaging delivery.

What students said

“Very boring!!! His txt book sucks :/ & he uses his student kinda like test to change his lectures and books. .”
PSY258

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring details.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very boring!!! His txt book sucks :/ & he uses his student kinda like test to change his lectures and books. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review on boredom and textbook issues. Credibility rating: Low.

😴 Lecture Engagement

30/100

“Very boring!!! His txt book sucks :/ & he uses and books.”

📚 Textbook Frustration

25/100

“Iv asked several students what they think about the book and everyone agrees its sucks.”

👎

18/100

“ but maybe ask students and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very boring!!!
  • Way to unnecessarily lengthy on lectures and his txt book.
  • but maybe ask students and .

Theme 2

📖 About Materials

  • His txt book sucks :/
  • everyone agrees its sucks

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one moderately detailed review from 2019 limits confidence in any broad conclusion.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSY2581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values