AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Spencer Swarts

CHEM200L · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take only if you will and can live with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderLab HeavyUnclear CriteriaRedo OpportunitiesFirst-Time Teaching
  • CHEM200L is a .
  • Some students earn A with effort and redos; .
  • and skipping risks failing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with redos and effort, but and .

All evidence comes from three in-person CHEM200L reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty ratings cluster at 3-4 with repeated tough-lab and heavy-work comments.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

; and you will not pass.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Only one of ; .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

; redos and one dropped lab help but .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lab reports and calculations demand real work even when time is adequate.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Approachable in class for some, weak walkthroughs and email response for others; first-time teaching shows.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade centers on lab reports with few graded items rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CHEM200L is tough but manageable with effort; redos help but criteria and .

Main concern

and limited accessibility hurt some students.

What students said

“Spencer was a but fair. and approachable”
CHEM200L
“ 30/100 lab report.”
CHEM200L
“if .”
CHEM200L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is lab-report driven with some redos; .

Lab ReportsRedos AllowedFew Graded ItemsUnclear Criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person CHEM200L grades mainly through lab reports with possible redos and one dropped lab.

Lab ReportsRedos AllowedDropped LabUnclear Criteria
“He allowed some redos and dropped 1 lab. Be prepared work.”
CHEM200L
“ 30/100 lab report.”
CHEM200L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Compared to the and it is possible to do well if you're willing to put effort into the labs.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person CHEM200L reviews on grading, labs, and access. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

35/100

“Spencer was a but fair.”

📧 Accessibility Issues

40/100

“Doesn't respond to time-sensitive emails when you're asking specific questions”

🧪 Effort Required

30/100

“Be prepared work.”

Theme 1

🧪

  • Be prepared work.
  • You also have more than .
  • Manageable, but if .

Theme 2

📊

  • but fair
  • 30/100 lab report

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed in-person reviews from late 2018 with mixed but coherent themes; still a small sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM200L3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values