AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Lindsay Stenovec

NUTR153 · NUTRITION153 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Solid online nutrition option if and discussions on time, and accept no .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaGet ready to readQuiz heavy onlineFast gradingMixed online difficulty
  • Online NUTR153 mixes weekly quizzes and discussions with exams; some find it easy if you participate, others find the textbook dry and exams fact-heavy.
  • and she responds and grades quickly; no is a common note.
  • , but older online reviews complain about boring book and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Several students got As by meeting deadlines and participating, but and there is no .

Online reviews split between easy with participation and hard fact exams; the A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is intro nutrition with ; difficulty ratings range from very easy to moderately hard.

Online difficulty swings from 1 to 4; and busy work at moderate challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online work is deadline-driven participation; the .

Online evidence centers on weekly posts and quizzes; only the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, and worth taking again despite older complaints about dry materials.

Recommendation strength is higher in newer online reviews; older online posts are more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Clear criteria and , but discussion opinions graded and zero for others.

Format shift

Online mixed on leniency; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly quizzes, discussions, and exams; while others report busy work and reading.

Format shift

Online split between light weekly tasks and heavy book work; in-person stresses busy work.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students praise clarity, feedback, and responsiveness; a minority find the approach unhelpful and the book dry.

Format shift

Stronger praise online for structure and responsiveness; in-person highlights patience and fairness.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and final rather than exams only.

Format shift

Online emphasizes quizzes plus exams; , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Patient and fair with and busy work; effort needed for an A and no .

Main concern

Lots of busy work and .

What students said

“She's a wonderful patient and fair teacher. The class requires a lot of reading, but you actually learn a lot.”
NUTRITION153

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Mostly weekly quizzes, discussion posts, and exams; , but textbook and .

Main concern

Dry textbook, syllabus quiz, and .

What students said

“ . As long as you participate and meet deadlines, you'll ace the class.”
NUTR153
“ book with questions about percentages from some old statistics from 2007.”
NUTR153
“ . 2 quizzes and 1 discussion post per week with a few exams.”
NUTR153

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and weekly chapters; format is standard online testing with no proven proctoring details.

Weekly chapter quizzesMidterm and finalFact-based textbook questionsQuizlet mentioned for some terms

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams as part of busy work without detailing proctoring.

QuizzesAssignmentsExams
“Overall, there is a lot of busy work, which and exams.”
NUTRITION153

Online

and final; some say answers are on Quizlet, others say exams are extremely hard and fact-heavy.

Weekly quizzesMidterm and finalTextbook fact questionsQuizlet study help
“For the midterm, final, and .”
NUTR153
“ .”
NUTR153

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . As long as you participate and meet deadlines, you'll ace the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

72/100

“ . 2 quizzes and 1 discussion post per week with a few exams.”

📚 Reading Load

50/100

“The book is very dry and boring, almost impossible to read.”

👍 Easy Path When Engaged

80/100

“As long as you participate and meet deadlines, you'll ace the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Great Teacher!!! . Her plan is together and easy to follow.
  • She's a wonderful patient and fair teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . As long as you participate and meet deadlines, you'll ace the class.
  • .
  • be prepared to put some effort in to get an A.

Theme 3

📖 About Materials

  • The textbook is required, but I only used it to answer the .
  • The book is very dry and boring, almost impossible to read.
  • The class requires a lot of reading, but you actually learn a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews from 2015-2018 with mixed tones and limited grade detail reduce confidence despite consistent course focus.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUTR1534 reviews
483261 review
NUTRITION1531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1