AI Rate Professor

Communication

Mario Sanguinet

COMS103 · COMMS103 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Proceed with caution; passionate teaching exists but and weak structure make the class a gamble.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderDisorganized structureLack of rubricsPassionate lecturesInconsistent experience
  • one enjoyed lectures and ; one found the class unstructured and harsh.
  • and uneven organization around deadlines and expectations.
  • Attendance reports conflict and .
  • Overall risk is high unless .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student earned an A while another got a and weak rubrics.

Both reviews are in-person COMS103 variants.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content difficulty is moderate; the main friction is structure and .

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; the other says it was mandatory.

Conflicting in-person attendance reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

One student would not retake after a harsh unstructured experience; the .

Split in-person opinions with 50 percent would-take-again overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

; one cites missing rubrics and feeling blindsided on grades.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload details are sparse; stress centers on a and few high-stakes graded items.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Lectures can feel passionate and clear, but organization and interpersonal tone draw strong criticism.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

GRADED BY FEW THINGS with a and little clarity on other assessments.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person COMS103 feels passionate but and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“The .”
COMS103
“Not the , and I constantly felt out of the loop on when things were due.”
COMMS103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment feels high-stakes with a and limited prep .

Massive midtermNo study guide mentionedFew graded itemsHarsh grading

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as massive with no study guide; rubrics often missing so .

Massive midtermNo study guideHarsh grading
“No study guide on the .”
COMMS103
“The and us students were often blindsided by a lack of class.”
COMS103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The and us students were often blindsided by a lack of class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting grading toughness and organization conflict. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

25/100

“The and us students were often blindsided by a lack of class.”

📂 Organization Issues

35/100

“Not the , and I constantly felt out of the loop on when things were due.”

🎯 Lecture Passion

60/100

“ , and you can tell he's passionate about what he does.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and you can tell he's passionate about what he does.
  • The teacher showed his own personal problems by projecting his insecurities, anxiety, and passive-aggressiveness onto the students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The and us students were often blindsided by a lack of rubric.
  • No study guide on the .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting 2018 reviews make the picture unstable despite concrete details.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMMS1031 review
COMS1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values