AI Rate Professor

English

Jill Ikari

ENG47A · ENG249 · ENG208 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her for standard composition or intro English, not if you .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAccessible outside classReading-heavy literature focusFun and funnyWriting feedback mixedParticipation matters
  • General English courses feel fun, easy, and growth-oriented.
  • Creative writing fit is weaker when class shifts to reading and analysis.
  • Very small sample makes course match more important than overall fame.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Reported grades are solid B to A with low difficulty comments and one explicit easy-class endorsement.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students describe fun, easy English work with .

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One course marked attendance optional, another mandatory with skip-class risk tags.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Two enthusiastic yes-leaning .

All recommendation evidence is in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grades land in B to A range without harsh-grader complaints; .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

70/100

Reading-heavy but overall easy workload with conferences and writing tasks rather than crushing volume.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Students call her fun, caring, and accessible, though .

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and participation more than formal exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students split between loving her as a funny easy English professor and finding creative writing too literature-focused with .

Main concern

Course design may emphasize reading analysis over polishing student writing.

What students said

“Much of the class was focused on reading and analyzing literature as opposed to perfecting our writing.”
ENG249
“Very fun, easy class! I feel that I improved with my writing overall.”
ENG208
“funny a'f. :P learned a lot from her. . ever.”
ENG47A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and conferences rather than high-stakes proctored exams.

Writing-focused assessmentConferencesLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; work is writing and literature analysis.

Written workConferencesReading analysis
“the unhelpful”
ENG249
“Very fun, easy class! I feel that I improved with my writing overall.”
ENG208

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a good English teacher, just not for a creative writing class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with no online sample. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Fit

70/100

“funny a'f. :P learned a lot from her. . ever.”

📝 Creative Writing Mismatch

40/100

“Much of the class was focused on reading and analyzing literature as opposed to perfecting our writing.”

👍 Course Enjoyment

80/100

“Very fun, easy class! I feel that I improved with my writing overall. :)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • funny a'f
  • ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
  • . ever.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very fun, easy class!
  • Overall, the class was a strong "meh"
  • Get ready to read

Theme 3

✍️

  • the unhelpful
  • Her conferences were a good addition
  • Caring

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews across different English courses with limited detail and no recent volume reduce reliability.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG2081 review
ENG2491 review
ENG47A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values