AI Rate Professor

English

Sara Safdie

ENG205 · ENG105 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · ENG43 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you fully share her food-sustainability focus and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderFood-Focused EnglishUnclear ExpectationsOpinionatedHigh Drop Rate
  • Classes feel more like food or environmental studies than standard English.
  • Students report , and .
  • Disagreeing with her views is widely said to hurt the experience and grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students say an A is nearly out of reach and even strong writers struggle to earn Bs under her standards.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and unclear prompts make the content feel harder than typical English.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

while she is often late or absent herself.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Vast majority urge others to wait for another professor due to harshness and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Repeated tough-grader reports; many say B is lucky and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

with shifting guidelines.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students frequently say she does not teach English clearly and focuses on personal food opinions.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

and a research paper with little traditional testing.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe disorganized English courses centered on GMOs and food with and high anxiety.

Main concern

and intolerance of opposing views drive poor grades and dropouts.

What students said

“whatever . you'll want to rip your hair out.”
ENG205
“This class is more of an environmental studies and food course instead of english.”
ENG101
“ ... She's the .”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and closed-book exams.

Essay HeavyResearch PaperPop QuizzesNo Traditional Midterm Focus

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a major paper; pop quizzes appear, but reviews do not clearly describe formal proctored exams.

Essay HeavyResearch PaperPop Quizzes
“ .”
ENG101
“We and a research paper.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . I am good at English, but this class was tough for me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 and off-topic focus. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

“Please do yourself a favor and !”

⚖️

15/100

“She's the . If you're looking to get an A, forget about it.”

📚 Course Focus

24/100

“This class is more of an environmental studies and food course instead of english.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaching style is non-existent
  • and unclear
  • all she cares about is her garden

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • legit impossible
  • Everyone in our class was thoroughly confused by her expectations for writing
  • I am a straight A student and earned my first B in college

Theme 3

🗣️ About Classroom Climate

  • she'll bash on it like never before
  • if you disagree with her, she won't hesitate to call you out
  • Yells at students, we started with 40 student and ended up with 15

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

33 reviews over many years with strongly , and course focus.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ENG10112 reviews
ENG2058 reviews
ENGL1014 reviews
ENG1053 reviews
ENGL2053 reviews
Show 3 more courses
2051 review
425071 review
ENG431 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1