AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

J Qumsiya

MATH46 · MATH96 · MAT52 · MATH116 · MATH38 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Only take him if and ; many students advise avoiding him for math.

Best fit · Effort For RewardThick Accent Hard to FollowBoard Mistakes CommonHeavy Nightly HomeworkPop Quizzes FrequentPolarizing Math Teacher
  • Many students struggle with his thick accent and small board writing.
  • and .
  • Some say he wants you to pass and if you put in work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible if you keep up with and , but nothing is handed out free.

Almost all ; the one online review did not report a grade path.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard college math but lectures move fast and mistakes plus accent make learning harder than the material alone.

Difficulty complaints appear in both formats; online focused on language barriers more than concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple tags and comments say and skipping means you will not pass.

; online also listed attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

, and many urge avoiding him if math is already hard.

, but recent and online tone is much more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some report tough grading and pop quizzes; others note dropped lowest tests and .

Format shift

Leniency details .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of and reports of roughly 30 nightly problems plus frequent quizzes and multiple tests.

Format shift

Workload complaints are concentrated in in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Helpful and funny for and rude for others; accent and board errors are recurring issues.

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed; the lone online review is strongly negative on clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of nightly homework, pop quizzes, multiple chapter tests, and a .

Format shift

Assessment structure is described mainly in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some praise humor and help, others , and .

Main concern

Accent, board errors, mandatory presence, and .

What students said

“He makes mistakes often, writes on the board really small and you can barely understand what he is saying.”
MATH46
“He is a great teacher, if you don't understand some part of the material he will repeat it and ”
MATH38
“beware of the roughly 30 questions of , as they can be rough”
MATH96

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative, focused on incomprehensible English and .

Main concern

Students could not understand spoken lectures and many dropped.

What students said

“i can't understand his english. please don't go to this class because almost half of us dropped the class”
MATH96

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often multiple choice with frequent quizzes; .

Multiple Choice TestsOptional Take-Home ReplacementTest Corrections Extra CreditPop QuizzesIn-Person Finals

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a non-multiple-choice final for some courses.

Multiple Choice TestsPop QuizzesTest CorrectionsDrop Lowest Test
“Total of 5 tests including the final, and had a 120 question optional take home test that .”
MATH38
“ and the so don't get use to the multiple choice.”
MATH46

Online

review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you already have a hard time with math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews spanning 2012-2018, highlighting accent clarity, homework load, and split recommendation tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🗣️ Accent and Clarity Issues

40/100

“i can't understand his english. please don't go to this class because almost half of us dropped the class”

📚

32/100

“beware of the roughly 30 questions of , as they can be rough”

⚠️ Polarizing Teaching Quality

48/100

“He makes mistakes often, writes on the board really small and you can barely understand what he is saying.”

🛠️ Help Available If You Persist

55/100

“if you don't understand some part of the material he will repeat it and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • writes on the board really small and you can barely understand what he is saying
  • He is a funny teacher and will notice if you are gone
  • John speaks very softly and with a thick accent

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • you have to work for it he doesn't give any free handouts
  • Got an A in his class. It was pretty easy since I did the
  • will give you a

Theme 3

❤️ About Character and Help

  • When I ask for help on certain problems, he sits there and says "I don't know, figure it out"
  • He is very rude and gets offended when you ask questions
  • Prof. Qumsiya wants everyone to pass his class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews span many years with mixed but detailed comments; grade data is sparse and opinions are inconsistent.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH385 reviews
MATH465 reviews
MATH962 reviews
MAT521 review
MATH1161 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1