AI Rate Professor

English

Hedda Fish

ENGLISH101 · ENG205 · ENGLI205 · ENGLISH205 · ENG51 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENG49 · ENGL205 · 63 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you want a harsh writing boot camp and can accept that an A is unlikely.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely Tough GraderVague Essay PromptsHard to Earn an AHeavy Reading and PapersPolarizing English Instructor
  • Most students warn she is an .
  • Essay prompts are often called vague, and .
  • A minority say she improves writing if you rewrite constantly and follow directions exactly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Many students say A grades are almost never given and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content itself is standard composition work, but , and harsh grading make the experience hard.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation frequently matter, with warnings not to miss class or arrive late.

and vary by semester.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and many reviews explicitly say to stay away despite a smaller set of positive experiences.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly report severe deductions for formatting details and little chance of an A.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and participation requirements create a substantial load.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

A few students praise feedback and learning gains, but .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

and papers, with limited emphasis on traditional midterms or exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

expectations, and low take-again sentiment, with a few students valuing the rigor.

Main concern

Harsh, nitpicky grading and hard work.

What students said

“ if you want an A.”
ENG101
“I got a because I forgot to staple my works cited onto it.”
ENG101
“She is an !”
ENGLISH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper-driven, often ending in a written final rather than a .

Written Final EssayMultiple PapersNo Traditional Midterm OftenParticipation and Oral Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and often a written final, with participation also affecting the grade.

Written Final EssayMultiple PapersParticipation Matters
“There isn't a .”
ENG101
“4 papers are required within the semester. Tons of reading.”
ENG101
“Class is mandatory because of in class activities and oral quizzes.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Not a bad person, but a truly horrid professor.”

⚖️

12/100

“She would give students 5/25 for .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“my advice.. STAY FAR AWAY from this professor. she. is. HORRIBLE.”

📚 Workload & Papers

32/100

“SO MANY PAPERS”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't clarify what she wants in your essays
  • Lectures are so boring
  • firm but fair

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • really a !!!!
  • Getting higher than a C on anything is nearly impossible
  • you'll be LUCKY to get a C

Theme 3

⚠️ About Red Flags

  • HATE HER. RUN RUN RUN
  • She favors students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

63

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a durable pattern of and low recommendation despite occasional positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 512
3 out of 510
2 out of 518
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ENG10125 reviews
ENG2058 reviews
ENGL1014 reviews
ENGLISH1014 reviews
ENGL2052 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENGLISH2052 reviews
424251 review
831211 review
ENG491 review
ENG511 review
ENGLI2051 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1