AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Fred Chambers

CHEM100L · CHEM152 · CHEM152L · 152L · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid CHEM152 lecture with Chambers unless you can teach yourself; if you show up prepared and on time.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesUnclear explanationsTrick questions on examsHarsh with questionsLab easier than lecture
  • and disorganized while .
  • and poorly aligned with lectures.
  • Attendance and lateness matter more in lab sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earn As in and notebooks, but and poorly aligned so an A still costs real self-study.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

CHEM152 is repeatedly called extremely difficult with multi-chapter detailed exams and skipped steps, while .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping or arriving late hurts, especially in labs.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

About two in five would take again, and many strong students .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

44/100

and notebook exams, but and tough.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Labs are notebook-based and manageable; and heavy multi-chapter tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

A few students praise real-life explanations, but most report skipped steps, poor Q and A, and disorganization.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments emphasize , and lab exams from notebooks.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CHEM152 lecture reviews are mostly negative about clarity and organization, while and passable experiences if you attend and prepare notebooks.

Main concern

, and exams that feel misaligned or trick-heavy.

What students said

“ . Bad at addressing student questions.”
CHEM152
“Purposely puts trick questions on the exams.”
CHEM152
“Just show up do the labs and its an easy A.”
CHEM152L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Lecture exams are detailed, multi-chapter, and often called trick-heavy, while .

Multi-chapter examsTrick questionsVague gradingLab notebook examsPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

questions and little prep; lab exams may allow notebook use.

Trick questionsMulti-chapter examsLab notebook examsPop quizzes
“Purposely puts trick questions on the exams.”
CHEM152
“The questions on the (you get to use it for the exam).”
152L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I got an A, but he's an awful professor. Avoid!”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture clarity problems and lab contrast. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Clarity

36/100

“ and is horrible at explaining lecture.”

⚠️

34/100

“Purposely puts trick questions on the exams.”

🧪

55/100

“Just show up do the labs and its an easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . Bad at addressing student questions.
  • Skips many crucial steps
  • He made somewhat challenging and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Professor Chambers class is EXTREMELY difficult.
  • his exams usually include 3 chapters and are extremely detailed
  • Just show up do the labs and its an easy A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Treatment

  • His teaching revolves from helpful to being extremely condescending when you ask questions!
  • Unclear and impatient. Almost everyone dropped the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen detailed in-person reviews span several years with consistent complaints about lecture clarity, though .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM1527 reviews
CHEM152L4 reviews
152L1 review
CHEM100L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1