AI Rate Professor

English

Matt Feigner

ENG101 · ENGL105 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you will speak up, do the readings, and want solid writing growth rather than an easy silent A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation heavyFew high-stakes papersColorful languageStrong feedbackReading intensive
  • Class participation is mandatory and heavily weighted; shy students struggle.
  • Only a few papers, but they must be high quality and well-prepared.
  • Upfront, joking style that builds real writing and analysis skills.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Few graded items help, but and participation counts, so most leave with B-range grades.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but and analysis keep it from feeling easy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and participation is a core grade driver.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

86/100

Both reviewers would take him again for speak.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Graded by few things with , but expectations for .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

Only a few papers plus readings and class talk, not a flood of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students leave with stronger writing tools and a new perspective despite blunt jokes.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grades rest on a small number of .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English sections demand constant participation and but blunt professor.

Main concern

Mandatory speaking and colorful language can alienate shy or easily offended students.

What students said

“First of all be prepared to speak up in class because class participation is extremely important!”
ENGL105
“He only assigned a few papers but they were expected to be quality.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and participation more than formal exams, with .

Few graded papersParticipation heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on a few quality papers and in-class .

Few graded papersParticipation heavy
“He only assigned a few papers but they were expected to be quality.”
ENG101
“class participation is extremely important!”
ENGL105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Matt was a wonderful professor. I'm going to walk away from this class retaining the information and tools I was given.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 , and teaching tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“I left this class with a new perspective to writing and analyzing texts.”

🗣️ Participation Pressure

18/100

“If you're a shy person this class may not be suited for you.”

📝 Paper Focus

68/100

“He only assigned a few papers but they were expected to be quality.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he's an upfront professor & is always joking around
  • His language can be colorful but get past that and he's solid.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Get ready to read
  • GRADED BY FEW THINGS
  • do the readings and come prepared

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two detailed 2017 reviews with consistent themes, but tiny sample and old dates limit confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1011 review
ENGL1051 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values