AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Karen Brinton

CHEM152L · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

experiences split sharply, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing ReviewsSlow Returning WorkCaring vs UnresponsiveClear ExpectationsLab-Centered
  • .
  • Both note slow or missing return of graded lab work.
  • Attendance is mandatory for CHEM152L.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

One student earned an A+ and , while the other never knew standing all semester.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Chemistry lab difficulty ratings are high and the .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student highly recommends her and the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; negative review says labs were never returned so standing was unknown.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Lab course with regular labs and a final; .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Split between excellent teaching and care versus claims of absence and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Labs and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CHEM152L reviews are split between a and a claim of missing lab returns and a .

Main concern

Slow or and conflicting reports of reliability.

What students said

“She's the returned any of .”
CHEM152L
“Incredibly knowledgeable, and really knows how to teach the material.”
CHEM152L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; one review claims the final was mishandled remotely.

Lab ReportsIn-Person Final MentionedFeedback Delay

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final; one student said she and asked for scanned tests.

LabsFinal ExamSlow Graded Returns
“she NEVER returned any of . Seriously, no one knew how they were doing the entire semester.”
CHEM152L
“And she didn't show up the day of the and send back the ”
CHEM152L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's the returned any of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews of CHEM152L. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Incredibly knowledgeable, and really knows how to teach the material.”

⚠️

25/100

“she NEVER returned any of .”

❤️ Student Care Split

70/100

“Extremely easy to approach, cares about students.”

Theme 1

🧪 About Labs and Feedback

  • NEVER returned any of
  • slow to return graded work

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • cares about students
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two contradictory in-person reviews from the same course year make the overall picture unreliable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM152L2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1