AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Kathryn Katie Clark

NUTR155 · NUTR153 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Skip if you can—reviews warn of heavy content, weak guidance, and uneven organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHeavy Content LoadTest HeavyMixed Online FeedbackLittle Guidance
  • Workload and organization complaints dominate negative reviews
  • Some students found older sections easy with light quizzes

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students coasted with open quizzes and easy projects, while others faced heavy graded volume and .

All counted reviews are treated as in-person per flags.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content can feel light when quizzes are look-up friendly, but volume of materials and .

All counted reviews are treated as in-person per flags.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

; others do not emphasize strict attendance.

All counted reviews are treated as in-person per flags.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Zero would-take-again rate and .

All counted reviews are treated as in-person per flags.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some full credit for missed quizzes and , but test errors and .

Format shift

Mixed in-person-tagged reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

PowerPoints, , and diet analysis create a large weekly load.

Format shift

Especially strong in the most recent review.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some enjoyed lectures and motivation, but , and poorly tested.

Format shift

Polarized across five reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of quizzes, exams, projects, and .

Format shift

Varies by course section.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some found easy quizzes and , and poor guidance.

Main concern

Heavy weekly content with little clarity on what is tested, plus organization issues.

What students said

“this was the worst online class ever! If and .”
NUTR155
“Literally the .”
NUTR153
“Her class is fairly easy.”
NUTR153

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and exams are common; students report limited guidance and occasional test-item errors.

QuizzesExamsTest Errors Reported

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Heavy quiz and questions.

QuizzesExamsTest Errors Reported
“The questions on the and she had to correct our grades”
NUTR153
“little guidance on what is being tested other than read all of the above”
NUTR155

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lots of materials pp, recorded . A lot of work need a LOT of time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting workload, organization, and mixed ease. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Heavy Workload

28/100

“A lot of work need a LOT of time.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“If and .”

📋 Organization Issues

35/100

“This instructor is very disorganized- school ended 3 weeks ago and we ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were awesome and motivated me to eat better
  • Didn't really feel like I had a professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Her class is fairly easy
  • Too much content each week
  • 10 Q quizes, 1 hour. Look um up, answer

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews with mixed detail and polarity; sample is small but strong negative themes appear more than once.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NUTR1534 reviews
NUTR1551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1