AI Rate Professor

Music

Igor Korneitchouk

MUSIC201 · RECITALS · MUS105 · 150A · MUS190 · MUSIC100 · MUSI206A · MUSIC105 · MUSIC190 · MUSI105 · MUSI100 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you and never miss class; otherwise pick another music professor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict AttendanceOpinionated GraderEssay-HeavyExperimental Music FocusPolarizing
  • and following his preferred viewpoints, with .
  • ; missing class for illness can tank your grade or get you dropped.
  • Some students love his passion and resubmit-friendly essays; many call him rude, biased, and avoidable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting an A means writing essays exactly his while attendance and opinion alignment matter as much as content.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Intro-level music content can feel easy, but , and strict participation raise the real intellectual bar.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance is repeatedly described as a few absences including illness.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Passionate music lovers who follow directions sometimes praise him, but many students say , and harsh essays.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many report failing or rewriting most papers and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Main load is multiple descriptive essays, discussions, concerts, and heavy .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Reviews split between clear passionate lectures that spark interest and boring, rude, or unqualified teaching.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Essays, discussions, and participation drive the grade far more than traditional timed exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and attendance-policed, with polarizing lectures on experimental music and little room for dissenting opinions.

Main concern

can destroy grades even when content seems easy.

What students said

“Boring and awful. All participation is required. If you miss even 1 class all semester your grade goes down.”
MUSIC100
“As long as your very descriptive when writing about the music performed the .”
MUSI100
“ and he is extremely biased.”
MUSIC105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on descriptive essays and participation with possible resubmits, not clearly proctored sit-down finals.

Essay-Based GradingResubmit PapersConcert ReportsParticipation Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, concerts, and participation rather than clearly described closed-book finals.

Essay-Based GradingResubmit PapersConcert Reports
“The and is very precise in what he wants and absolutely no late work.”
MUSIC100
“As long as your very descriptive when writing about the music performed the .”
MUSI100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 in-person , and strict attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“He is very dedicated and passionate about music.”

🚫

42/100

“Awful professor and terrible class. Very rude. !!!!”

📝

28/100

“I have passed my English 205 class with an A and he fails me miserably .”

📍

12/100

“If you miss even 1 class all semester your grade goes down.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • boring, and very bias if your thoughts or ideas don't match his
  • He is very dedicated and passionate about music
  • He makes things as clear as he can in the time he has

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the
  • HE FAILS MAINLY ALL, BUT YOU HAVE UNTIL THE END OF THE SEMESTER TO TRY AND PASS THEM
  • and you'll get an A

Theme 3

⚠️

  • All participation is required
  • I GOT DROPPED FOR MISSING 4 DAYS
  • Very rude. !!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty detailed in-person reviews spanning many years , and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MUSIC1056 reviews
MUSIC1005 reviews
MUSI1004 reviews
MUS1053 reviews
MUS1902 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MUSI1052 reviews
MUSIC1902 reviews
1051 review
150A1 review
1901 review
MUSI206A1 review
MUSIC2011 review
RECITALS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values