AI Rate Professor

English

laura brooks

ENG64 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

and real writing growth if you will keep up with the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed feedbackLots of homeworkResponsive emailsGroup projectsClear expectations
  • and responsive communication stand out across ENG101
  • Workload is substantial with projects and
  • Most students still call her a

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Doing the work honestly and on time leads to good grades, but volume and .

; in-person reviews still say work hard and you will do well.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but projects and readings keep it standard-challenging.

Both formats describe manageable content with substantial work; one online ENG64 review found teaching harder to follow.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and others say no, so flexibility depends on the section format.

Online ; in-person comments also vary or omit the detail.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students repeatedly call her a great or and support despite heavy work.

In-person praise is strongest; online is mostly positive with one strict ENG64 outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

She grades carefully with detailed comments and rewards honest completed work rather than easy free grades.

Format shift

Online and ; one online review called her pretty strict.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of , and steady writing make the load clearly college-level and time-consuming.

Format shift

Online comments mention LOTS OF HOMEWORK and group projects most directly.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and detailed feedback that improves writing.

Format shift

; online has one low ENG64 outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grading centers on papers, projects, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and projects; exams are not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise clear instructions, thorough expectations, and strong support when they complete the college-level workload.

Main concern

Expect a lot of work even if instructions and .

What students said

“She is one of the .”
ENG101
“Expect a lot of work, this is a college course.”
ENG101
“Professor Brookes is easy to talk to and and precise instructions.”
ENG64

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ENG sections emphasize steady assignments, group projects, and .

Main concern

and group work can hurt you if you procrastinate or get stuck with weak teammates.

What students said

“This class was a straight-forward English 101 class. It is important to do all of your assignments and do not wait until last minute for anything.”
ENG101
“ and makes sure you know what to work on.”
ENGL101
“If you are looking for an easy class, this class is not for you.”
ENGL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears driven by papers, projects, and ongoing work.

Assignment heavyProjectsDetailed paper feedback

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize thorough assignment expectations and .

Clear assignment expectationsDetailed feedback
“When it comes to assignments she gives everybody a big heads up on when to start them”
ENG101
“as along as you do the work, you will do well.”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews focus on assignments, group projects, and .

Group projectsPaper feedbackLots of homework
“There are a lot of group projects”
ENG101
“ and (as opposed to just giving a score with a random comment).”
ENGL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A must take professor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (5 online, 3 in and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

86/100

“ and (as opposed to just giving a score with a random comment).”

📚 Heavy But Fair Work

34/100

“Expect a lot of work, this is a college course.”

⭐ Strong Recommendation

88/100

“She is one of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Support

  • She , and just answering questions in general.
  • Laura Brooks is a great professor. She answers quickly on emails and ready to help.
  • One of the ! She loves her subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • There are a lot of group projects
  • If you are looking for an easy class, this class is not for you.
  • Just follow the instructions, and work honestly.

Theme 3

⚠️ Mixed Online Experience

  • Definitely could use improvement.
  • she is pretty strict as well.
  • This was a great class and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews from 2014-2016 cover both formats with , though grade data is sparse and one outlier exists.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1013 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
ENG642 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values