AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Rob Fender

ARCHITECTURE · ARCH106 · AUTOCAD · ARCH105 · ARCH101 · CAD · ARCH107 · REVIT111 · ARCH170 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take him in person for CAD or architecture if you want a projects.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient CAD mentorHands-on project coachFlexible with late workEasy if you keep upHelpful in lab
  • and extremely patient with CAD and architecture software.
  • and self-discipline; falling behind is hard to recover from.
  • The single recent online REVIT review is strongly negative about copy-paste instruction and frustration for beginners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many students call the class an easy A or piece of cake if you turn in projects and stay current.

Easy-A praise comes almost entirely from older in-person CAD reviews; the online REVIT review ends in withdrawal.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but and software learning can frustrate beginners who fall behind.

In-person CAD courses feel easy; the online REVIT section is described as harder without prior Revit skill.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but missing class on project-heavy weeks is strongly discouraged.

Evidence is almost all in person; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

as a fantastic, helpful instructor for CAD and architecture.

In-person reviews are highly positive; the single .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

He is flexible with late work and students say you pass if you complete and turn in the projects.

Format shift

Leniency comments are from in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Expect a ; workload is manageable if you stay on schedule.

Format shift

; online also centers on a full Revit project.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students repeatedly call him helpful, patient, and one of the .

Format shift

; the online review rates teaching poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

quizzes in most reported classes.

Format shift

Project focus appears in both formats with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Students praise him as helpful, patient, and one of the best teachers they have had, especially for CAD and architecture labs.

Main concern

Weekly projects with weak due-date structure require strong self-discipline so you do not fall behind.

What students said

“One of the , Very helpfull.”
ARCH170
“He will spend quality time with you and .”
ARCH105
“awsome teacher, you have to try not to get an A in this class”
ARCH101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review describes REVIT111 as copy-paste each semester, hard to enter without prior software skill, and .

Main concern

Beginners can get frustrated and fall behind with limited guided teaching of the software.

What students said

“ and will choose another professor for sure.”
REVIT111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Most classes rely on weekly projects rather than traditional exams, which keeps assessment low-pressure if you keep up.

Project-basedNo testsNo quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report ongoing projects.

No testsNo quizzesWeekly projects
“A but .”
ARCH107

Online

; the course centers on developing a Revit project.

Project-based
“He wants you to develop a project and do it in Revit”
REVIT111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the , Very helpfull. I am glad that I took this class just because the teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews (1 online, 17 in person), highlighting teaching help and project workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Rob's fantastic. He expects you to do the work, no push over here, but he convinces you that you CAN do the work.”

🎯 Easy A Potential

84/100

“awsome teacher, you have to try not to get an A in this class”

🛠️

55/100

“If you keep up with & turn in all of the but if you fall behind it is virtually impossible to catch back up.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He happily answers any questions and
  • He practically hold your hand throughout the entire class period.
  • extremely well-versed in the subject matter and is equally as helpful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A.
  • Piece of Cake!
  • pretty easy class

Theme 3

💻 About Software Learning

  • If you know how to turn on a computer you are far ahead of most of the class.
  • I recomend this teacher to those who have trouble with CAD.
  • if you are not savvy using the program, it is very easy to get frustrated

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews span many years with strong consistency on helpfulness, but most are old and grade data is sparse.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARCH1056 reviews
ARCH1703 reviews
REVIT1112 reviews
1051 review
ARCH1011 review
Show 5 more courses
ARCH1061 review
ARCH1071 review
ARCHITECTURE1 review
AUTOCAD1 review
CAD1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1