AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Wayman Johnson

CISC192 · C192 · CISE192 · CISCC · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if you already program well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpful InstructionVague AssignmentsStrict GraderSelf-Study RequiredAvoid for CS
  • Students repeatedly report little to no real instruction and answers like google it.
  • and mismatched to course level.
  • Older reviews are mixed, but newer and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Strict and real effort and outside help.

and poor support; in person also reports strict grading with little instruction.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

C++ programming feels hard because and help is limited.

Both formats describe high difficulty; online comments stress learning almost no usable skills.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

One online review marks attendance mandatory, while most .

; in person policy is mostly unstated.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students urge avoiding him due to weak teaching, unprofessional tone, and .

Online is near-unanimously negative; a few older in .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Multiple students call grading strict or nitpicky, with little instruction to match the standards.

Format shift

One in person review says grading was fair or generous, but .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload centers on programming assignments and book-based programs rather than endless reading.

Format shift

Online and in .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Comments cluster , and answers that just say google it.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially harsh on qualification and professionalism; in person is mixed but still weak overall.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Students emphasize programs, online student comments, and .

Format shift

Both formats stress coding work; and inconsistent.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person reviews swing from worst professor ever to fair and clear, but many cite no instruction and .

Main concern

if you need guidance.

What students said

“Horrible professor. Online he doesn't exist, zero instruction, just read this book then write these programs.”
CISE192
“ ”
CISC192
“ .”
CISC192

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

students call him unqualified, unprofessional, and .

Main concern

No real teaching support and .

What students said

“If you are planning to be a !”
CISC192
“This man is a completely unreasonable person. Un professional and impolite.”
CISC192

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mentioned as short or vague, with little evidence of open-book or proctored software policies.

Vague Test QuestionsIn-Person ExamsOnline Exam Posting Issues

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person students mention vague test wording and .

Vague Test QuestionsStrict Grading on Exams
“ and vague which made it very hard to do good even if you're a good programmer.”
CISC192
“Missed an exam because of a family emergence, and was given a score of 0 because of it.”
C192

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or .

Limited Exam Detail
“the assignments are weird and vague, if ”
CISC192

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible professor. Online he doesn't exist, zero instruction, just read this book then write these programs. Ask a question, response is " .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, , and mixed older praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Support

32/100

“Ask a question, response is " .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ if you can.”

📝

34/100

“ though he gives NO instruction at all. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • zero instruction, just read this book then write these programs
  • he's an English teacher and not qualified as computer science teacher
  • I think that and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • though he gives NO instruction at all
  • and vague
  • Easy class if you keep up w/ the readings and assignments

Theme 3

💬 About Professionalism

  • Un professional and impolite
  • Most uncompassionate professor
  • Great Guy. Easy if you are a good programmer

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews span many years with consistent complaints about weak help, but grades and and some praise is old.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CISC19210 reviews
C1921 review
CISCC1 review
CISE1921 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1