AI Rate Professor

English

Alan Silva

ENGL049 · ENGL205 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Stay away from this professor based on severe classroom climate and learning concerns.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWorst Professor EverHostile ClassroomHeavy Writing LoadPolitical RantsStudent Harassment Claims
  • Both reviews call him the .
  • Class time is described as rants and put-downs rather than real English instruction.
  • Workload is extreme, including far more writing than the course minimum.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Massive writing demands and a than fair.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students say they learned little content but still faced heavy, unpleasant academic demands.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory and the classroom is tightly controlled, including a seating chart.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Both reviews tell students to stay away and describe the class as something they dreaded.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students describe disrespectful treatment and crushing writing .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

One class required writing nearly 30,000 words, far above the stated course minimum.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students say he ranted, put people down, and taught almost no useful course content.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The dominant burden is extreme essay and word-count .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as hostile, unproductive, and extremely unpleasant.

Main concern

Disrespect, harassment reports, and almost no useful instruction.

What students said

“ .”
ENGL049
“The ! He was reported by multiple people in our class for harassment.”
ENGL205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize massive writing and poor classroom conduct more than a .

Extreme Writing LoadNo Clear Lecture Structure

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence focuses on excessive writing and hostile class .

Heavy Essay RequirementsMinimal Lecturing
“We had to write 3 times the minimum required for the course almost 30000 words.”
ENGL205
“I didn't learn anything except how much he hates the military, government, religion and sports.”
ENGL049

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The ! He was reported by multiple people in our class for harassment.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 severely negative in-person English reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

🚨 Classroom Safety Concerns

10/100

“He was reported by multiple people in our class for harassment.”

📝 Crushing Writing Load

10/100

“We had to write 3 times the minimum required for the course almost 30000 words.”

🚫 Do Not Enroll

5/100

“I dreaded every class, and wasn't the only one.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • didn't lecture once all semester just ranted about the govt and military
  • He demands respect yet disrespects his students and treats them like children.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload

  • We had to write 3 times the minimum required for the course almost 30000 words.
  • He made us read very weird books.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Climate

  • puts students down in front of class
  • Stay away!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two highly negative reviews exist, so the signal is strong but the sample size remains very small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL0491 review
ENGL2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values