AI Rate Professor

English

Craig Colby

ENGLISH205 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; current evidence is extremely negative and thin.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSingle harsh reviewWorst teacher claimHigh difficultyInsufficient data
  • Only one review exists and it rates quality 1 with difficulty 5.
  • The only student comment is The !
  • Not enough .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

The only review pairs quality 1 with difficulty 5 and offers no path to an easy A.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Student rated difficulty at maximum with no softer comments to balance it.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The : the .

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

and lowest quality score.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

No workload specifics; max difficulty rating implies a hard experience.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Single review rates teaching quality at 1 and calls her the worst teacher.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not describe how and exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

A single in-person ENGLISH205 review rates her poorly with no detail beyond calling her the .

Main concern

Only one vague negative review; reliability is very low.

What students said

“The !”
ENGLISH205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format for ENGLISH205.

“The !”
ENGLISH205

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The !”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with minimal detail. Credibility rating: Low.

👎 Overall Quality

12/100

“The !”

🔥 Perceived Difficulty

10/100

“The !”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Overall Experience

  • The !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

One short 2014 review with almost no detail cannot support a reliable professor profile.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGLISH2051 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1