AI Rate Professor

Web Design

D Taniguchi

WEBD166 · WEBD168 · WEBD152 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Strong pick for web design courses if you want practical coding help and a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeable coderReal-world web skillsHelpful and funnyA+ friendlyFree resources
  • Strong real-world coding knowledge and helpful lectures
  • Most students earn high grades with manageable difficulty
  • One critique notes information overload and unchallenging assignments

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Multiple A+ reports and low difficulty ratings; success is realistic with ordered course sequence and effort.

Online and ; online notes programming is still tough.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

and volume, but most rate difficulty moderate and doable in sequence.

Online review stresses .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; comments do not show a single strict policy.

and online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

as the department standout for coding and support.

Online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students report A+ outcomes and a success-oriented approach with free resources.

Format shift

Both formats show high grades; sample is small.

Workload

Light

72/100

Assignments are not overly hard; main load is absorbing dense lecture information.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Praised as knowledgeable, funny, engaging, and .

Format shift

Strong praise in both online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Comments emphasize projects, practice, and lecture content more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, free resources, and engaging lectures; one student found content volume too high.

Main concern

Dense information dump and .

What students said

“Great teacher, good learning experience, and useful real-world application.”
WEBD168
“Goes above and beyond to make sure you succeed. Uses lots of free resources”
WEBD168
“Information was . Tons and tons of information.”
WEBD168

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

; programming was tough but teacher explained clearly and earned high praise.

Main concern

Programming material itself is inherently challenging online.

What students said

“Taniguchi was a great teacher and a very understanding explainer! I happened to be in his first online class ever, and ”
WEBD152

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely discuss formal exams; assessment appears assignment-driven with moderate academic rigor.

Project and assignment focusedLittle explicit exam proctoring detail

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize lectures and .

Lecture heavyPractice assignments
“Biggest suggestion is regarding assignments,they are not super challenging and dont really seem to help us practice the concepts.”
WEBD166

Online

Online ; focus is on understanding programming material.

No clear proctoring details
“Although the material for this class wasn't easy (learning any programming language is tough), Taniguchi was a great teacher and a !”
WEBD152

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Goes above and beyond to make sure you succeed. Uses lots of free resources one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (1 online, 5 in-person), highlighting coding skill and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

💻 Coding Expertise

88/100

“He's definitely the most knowledgable coder out of the WebD department”

👍 Strong Recommendation

90/100

“ !!”

📚 Dense Material

62/100

“Information was . Tons and tons of information.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor T is awesome!
  • He is a good teacher, quite funny, presents very relevant information
  • Taniguchi was a great teacher and a !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if a problem
  • learning any programming language is tough
  • A+

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only six reviews with consistent positivity but limited sample size and older date range reduce confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WEBD1683 reviews
WEBD1662 reviews
WEBD1521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values