AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Bill Craft

WEBD162 · CBTE162 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a thorough, practical web page course with a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerResponsive emailsHTML/CSS serious learningManageable workloadQuality textbookUnderstands right way
  • Responds quickly and gives ample time on online work
  • Packs substantial HTML/CSS content that stays manageable
  • Focused on doing things correctly, not just completing tasks

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

One A+ and low-to-moderate difficulty with .

Online review shows A+ and easy timing; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material is substantial for a short web course but described as manageable for serious learners.

online comment.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews do not establish a .

review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Both reviews are pure 5s urging students serious .

Positive recommendation is consistent online and in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

85/100

Ample completion time and an A+ report point to student-friendly grading.

Format shift

Grade detail mainly from online review.

Workload

Light

74/100

Packed but manageable content with enough time to finish work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Both reviews call him terrific or good, with strong focus on correct technique and support.

Format shift

Excellent ratings in both formats despite tiny sample.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments center on assignments and practical web skills rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

/CSS material with a strong book and emphasis on correct technique.

Main concern

Content volume is high even if manageable.

What students said

“Terrific professor. Took a 2 unit online course, but he really packed a TON of stuff into the class (don't worry, it's all manageable!).”
CBTE162

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online section praised for and +.

Main concern

Very thin evidence from a single short review.

What students said

“Good professor, responds quickly to emails, gives .”
WEBD162

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

No webcam, Lockdown Browser, or ; work is assignment-centered with flexible timing.

Assignment focusedAmple completion timeNo proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review focuses on content depth and a .

HTML/CSS project focusQuality textbook
“ if you're serious about learning HTML/CSS. He also uses a great book.”
CBTE162

Online

Online review and ample time for assignments; .

Ample assignment timeQuick email response
“Good professor, responds quickly to emails, gives .”
WEBD162

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He doesn't just want to teach you the material, but wants to make sure you understand how to do things the right way.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in-person), highlighting support and practical HTML/CSS focus. Credibility rating: Low.

⭐ Teaching Quality

95/100

“Terrific professor.”

⏱️ Supportive Timing

86/100

“gives .”

🌐 Serious HTML/CSS Learning

94/100

“ if you're serious about learning HTML/CSS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • wants to make sure you understand how to do things the right way

Theme 2

📈 About Workload

  • packed a TON of stuff into the class (don't worry, it's all manageable!)
  • gives .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews, both glowing, so consistency is high but sample size and detail are too thin for strong confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CBTE1621 review
WEBD1621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values