AI Rate Professor

Design

Dan Stoddard

INTE125 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you care deeply about design, can afford high-quality printing, and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate about designHeavy project loadPrinter-cost pressureMixed teaching clarityBusy-work assignments
  • Some students love his passion for interior design and say you learn a lot if you follow him.
  • Others report , and grading that punishes print quality and ink costs.
  • and awful-methods complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Heavy projects and and materials.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Interior design projects and tests are demanding and some students retain little.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendations swing from best professor ever and busy work.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grading hits hard on print quality and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report tons of work, busy-work assignments, and costly printing.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Passion and and weak tests by others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Projects and printed work dominate, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person INTE125 reviews split between passionate mentoring praise and complaints about busy work, printer costs, and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He is the . He is passionate about Interior design”
INTE125
“Graded too heavily on quality of printed pictures! As if we all have money to buy the ”
INTE125
“Awful teaching methods, doesn't really know .”
INTE125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are mentioned as confusing while projects and print quality drive much of the grade.

Confusing testsProject-heavy gradingPrint quality matters

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and heavy project or .

Confusing testsProject assignmentsPrint quality grading
“doesn't really know .”
INTE125
“ and ridiculous...make sure you have a good printer.”
INTE125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Perfect... He is the . He is passionate about Interior design and everything about it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting passion versus workload and print-cost friction. Credibility rating: Low.

🔥 Passion for Design

70/100

“He is passionate about Interior design and everything about it.Follow his lead you will learn a lot.”

📦 Heavy Workload

28/100

“Tons of work. Didn't retain much info.”

⚠️ Mixed Teaching

55/100

“Awful teaching methods, doesn't really know .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • passionate about Interior design
  • Very helpful and passionate about design
  • Awful teaching methods

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Graded too heavily on quality of printed pictures
  • Tons of work
  • and ridiculous

Theme 3

💸 About Costs

  • As if we all have money to buy the and a ton of ink
  • make sure you have a good printer

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

and sparse grade detail lower confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

INTE1254 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values