AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

E Sorman

CHEM152 · CHEMISTRY152 · CHEMLAB152 · CHM152 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid this professor if possible; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCannot TeachIllegible ExamsHeavy HomeworkConfusing LecturesHigh Drop Risk
  • Most students say he cannot teach, loses his train of thought, and fails to answer questions.
  • Labs and ; midterms and and hard to read.
  • A few older reviews defend traditional rigor, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and failing-class comments make an A very costly even for diligent students.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Chemistry content plus and most students.

Difficulty comments are entirely from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

set.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most reviews urge students not to take him, citing inability to teach and .

Recommendation sentiment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Labs are called brutally graded and he is said to have no problem failing a whole class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report a and major exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is that he cannot teach, forgets mid-sentence, and leaves questions unanswered.

Format shift

Teaching quality judgments .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and finals.

Format shift

Assessment mix is described in in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Overwhelmingly negative experience with incoherent , and illegible handwritten exams.

Main concern

Teaching quality is described as terrible with and high failure risk.

What students said

“Class is absolutely terrible. if it means having to wait until next semester.”
CHEM152
“ and illegible, labs were brutally graded. PLEASE save yourself the time and grade and .”
CHEMLAB152
“NEVER manages to answer students' questions no matter how simple. Incohesive & incomprehensible teaching style.”
CHEM152

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often handwritten and hard to read, with and .

Handwritten MidtermIllegible FinalHarsh Lab GradingHomework Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report handwritten illegible midterms and finals plus brutally graded labs.

Handwritten MidtermIllegible FinalHarsh Lab Grading
“ and .”
CHEMLAB152
“The and parts of it were illegible.”
CHEM152

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class is absolutely terrible. if it means having to wait until next semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“cannot teach”

📝 Illegible Exams

28/100

“ and .”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“Does not believe in text books, grades only on homework (which is about a and final.”

👎

18/100

“PLEASE save yourself the time and grade and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He forgets what he's talking about mid-sentence.
  • Incohesive & incomprehensible teaching style.
  • He does not answer direct questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Stated in the first classes that he has no problem failing a whole class.
  • but good ole' traditional prof.

Theme 3

📚

  • If you have to take this prof, you should buy a chem book to learn the information.
  • Read every textbook you can get ahold of...do ALL the HW problems (there is a lot).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed reviews from 2004-2006 show strong negative consensus with two outliers, but all data is old.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM1526 reviews
CHEMISTRY1521 review
CHEMLAB1521 review
CHM1521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values