AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Christine Kinney

MEDA115 · PHYRASSISTENT · PHYSTHERAP110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Solid pick if you will read the text, attend class, and want a straightforward health-science instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnows Her StuffStraight Forward ExpectationsScantron ExamsText-Based TeachingBlack-and-White Rules
  • Students say she is knowledgeable, friendly, and .
  • Exams are scantron and track the textbook closely if you read.
  • A minority find her teaching overly simple or rigid about grey-area answers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Reading the text and showing effort usually works, but .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is manageable for students who study the book, with mixed difficulty ratings around the middle.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

Students are told to attend and show effort, but .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most reviewers like her knowledge and clarity, with one strong criticism of teaching style.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Fair if you read and try; she is friendly but firm and not described as a .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

and preparing for scantron exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Knows the material and is straightforward, though .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams are the main checkpoint and are scantron questions tied to the text.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Small set of in-person health and PTA-related classes describe a knowledgeable instructor with .

Main concern

Some students feel assessments are oddly worded or overly rigid.

What students said

“She knows her stuff! Loved being in her class.”
MEDA115
“Teaches from the text and , so if you read & understand the text, you have it made.”
MEDA115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard scantron exams from the .

Scantron ExamsTextbook-BasedBlack-and-White Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and text-based with little room for grey-area answers.

Scantron ExamsTextbook-Based
“ , so if you read & understand the text, you have it made.”
MEDA115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She knows her stuff! Loved being in her class. Is very straight forward in what she expects from her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person , and mixed teaching style. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“great instructor, knows her stuff, friendly, but don't push her or cross her.”

📚

58/100

“Teaches from the text and .”

⚠️ Teaching Style Critique

40/100

“its like she is teaching a 2yr for a week how to hold a spoon & eat with it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very straight forward in what she expects
  • very sweet lady with a lot to teach
  • she goes by black and white

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you read & understand the text, you have it made
  • Attend class, show her you are trying and you will do fine

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four older reviews with no grade reports limit confidence despite a mostly coherent picture.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MEDA1152 reviews
PHYRASSISTENT1 review
PHYSTHERAP1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values