AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carter Sevick

MATH119 · STATIMATH · STATI119 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Only consider if you can verify current teaching style; one strong positive is outweighed by sparse, harsh negatives.

Best fit · Effort For RewardQuiz retakes availablePolarizing qualitySupportive when engagedHard stats sectionsSparse recent evidence
  • One detailed MATH119 , and group exam prep.
  • Two STATI-style reviews are extremely brief and rate him as a very bad professor.
  • All evidence is from 2011 in-person classes with no online sample.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The and , but short negatives imply students still struggle, so an A still takes real work.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty ratings run high on stats-style courses, and even the positive student stresses mastering the book.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

No .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One glowing recommendation is canceled .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and , but most reviews give no grade outcome detail.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Students mention textbooks and but do not describe an .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

One student found lectures clear and supportive; two others gave bottom-tier quality with almost no detail.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and group exam preparation rather than pure exam or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one student called him among the and , while two others simply labeled him a very bad professor.

Main concern

Extremely thin, decade-old sample with contradictory quality ratings.

What students said

“Professor Sevick did a great job making the material understandable to us, and he goes out of his way to ensure his students do well in his class, including , make up points, and .”
MATH119
“He is very bad Prof.”
STATIMATH
“He is very bad pro. i've seen.”
STATI119

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and ; no proctoring software is mentioned.

QuizzesGroup exam preparationMake-up points

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and group exam preparation; no lockdown or webcam policy is described.

QuizzesGroup exam preparationMake-up points
“including , make up points, and ”
MATH119

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Sevick did a great job making the material understandable to us, and he goes out of his way to ensure his students do well in his class, including , make up points, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews from 2011, highlighting split teaching quality and sparse evidence. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Coming from a UCSD student, one of the .”

⚠️ Harsh Counter-Reviews

20/100

“He is very bad Prof.”

🛟 Grade Support Tools

55/100

“including , make up points, and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • making the material understandable to us
  • one of the
  • He is very bad pro. i've seen.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and master the material
  • , make up points

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three 2011 in-person reviews, two of which are one-line insults, so consistency and detail are weak.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1191 review
STATI1191 review
STATIMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values