AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Margaret Magde

CHEM200L · CHEM · CHEM200LECT · CHEM200 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can self-study from the book and want a .

Best fit · Effort For Reward85% equals AUseless lecture packetHard tests easy scaleHelpful one-on-oneCondescending at times
  • Grading scale often sets A at 85% with , and tests.
  • some find them slow or confusing; many say the packet is useless and the book carries the class.
  • She can seem harsh or condescending yet helps when students ask, especially in lab.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students say 85% is an A with , and tests, so solid effort still yields a high grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

General chemistry content and soft cutoff.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students who self-study and ; others call lectures useless and urge avoidance.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Repeated reports that 85% is an A plus multiple dropped quizzes, homework, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly quizzes and homework plus study load keep workload real, though .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and helpful one-on-one; others cannot follow lectures and call her condescending.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grade depends on homework, frequent quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person Chem 200/L students report hard tests but a lenient scale, frequent drops, a widely disliked packet, and .

Main concern

Lectures and packet often feel useless while .

What students said

“Her A is 85% and you can drop 1 test, 2 hw and 4 quizzes.”
CHEM200
“HORRIBLE. .”
CHEM200
“I got an A in her class but definitely worked hard for it.”
CHEM200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Lecture exams are often hard and time-tight, but and .

Hard in-person testsDrop policiesOpen-note lab testsOptional final with note card

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard with limited time; and some finals allow a 4x6 note card.

Hard testsOpen-note lab testsNote card on finalOptional final
“ .”
CHEM200L
“ but the and you are allowed a 4 X 6 card for notes.”
CHEM200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her A is 85% and you can drop 1 test, 2 hw and 4 quizzes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 in-person reviews, highlighting grading leniency, lecture quality, and mixed personality. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Lenient A Cutoff

74/100

“An A is 85% which saved me.”

📚 Packet Problems

30/100

“don't bother buying her lecture packet. It's useless.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“I didn't understand her lecturing but most of what I needed to know was in the book.”

❤️ Help When Asked

60/100

“She is very helpful 1 on 1 with you, so ask for help.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 85 and up is A!!!
  • I got an A in her class but definitely worked hard for it
  • but she gives you ample opportunity to get a good grade

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she teaches at a level where students bad at math can keep up
  • She can be a little boring, but she knows her stuff

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She does come off as condescending, but she will help you, just ask
  • Will make you feel stupid for asking questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty detailed in-person reviews spanning many years , and mixed teaching.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM20021 reviews
CHEM200L7 reviews
CHEM1 review
CHEM200LECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values