AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Fred Hueneberg

MATH · MARH95 · 095ELEMENTARY · MATH96 · MATH95 · MATH096 · MATH095 · MATH32 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are highly independent and can .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTake-home testsCondescending toneHigh fail rates reportedHeavy homeworkPolarizing over years
  • Many later reviews describe unclear teaching, hostility to questions, and very high fail rates.
  • , and even pizza parties.
  • and expectations often feel ahead of what was taught.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

, but many report widespread failing and little partial credit, so an A is far from free.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students repeatedly say he goes too fast, expects prior knowledge, and leaves concepts unexplained.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but policies are not clearly spelled out as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Recent and mid-period reviews overwhelmingly say run, despite a pocket of older enthusiastic fans.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

, but reports of no partial credit, vague scales, and mass failures dominate.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple students describe way too much homework that must be kept up constantly.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Common themes are copying notes, talking to the board, refusing questions, and being hard to understand.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

enough to matter.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person developmental math reviews are sharply split: many call him the , while and personal help.

Main concern

Condescending style and reports that most of the class fails.

What students said

“pretty much 98% of the class failing, 2 A's in the whole class and 2 C's”
MATH096
“Great teacher easy A. and I hate math.”
MATH95
“He is rude to students for asking questions.”
MATH96

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, though teaching quality still undercuts that benefit.

Take-home testsUnclear grading scaleHomework-driven prep

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

the grade, with little detail on proctoring.

Take-home tests
“ makes the class very easy to pass”
MATH95
“ ”
MATH096

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is by far the worst math teacher you could ”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 in-person , and polarized personality. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“ and is hard to understand.”

📉 Fail-Rate Alarm

20/100

“Only 2 people passed class.”

📝

68/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“Run!! !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • copies old notes onto the board and expects you to learn from that
  • expects you to know everything before he even teaches
  • He's the best math teacher I have ever had

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • pretty much 98% of the class failing
  • Gives out way too much hwk
  • Great teacher easy A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • condescending & belligerent towards the students
  • Rude and mean to his students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews across many years show a consistent later-negative pattern tempered by older positive outliers.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 57
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH9612 reviews
MATH958 reviews
MATH0965 reviews
MATH4 reviews
MATH0953 reviews
Show 3 more courses
095ELEMENTARY1 review
MARH951 review
MATH321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values