AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Frank Hall

MATHMATH · TRIG104 · MATH96 · MATH95 · MATH032 · MATH32 · MATH096 · TRIG101 · MATH095 · TRIGMATH104 · MATH38 · MATH035 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if you can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandExcessive homeworkMonotone lecturesNice but can't teachStudents correct him
  • Students repeatedly , and .
  • Workload is heavy with tons of homework while teaching adds little clarity.
  • and unclear explanations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible mainly by self-study, but tests dock points for everything and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content feels harder because lectures confuse students and assume prior math skill rather than building it.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

notes that respectful strong students get some leeway.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students say if you can help it because and classes are boring.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

One review calls grading fair, but and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly report excessive weekly homework and high out-of-class time.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students describe quiet, monotone, where classmates often correct board work.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear driven by heavy homework plus difficult tests with limited clarity on weighting.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math classes feel boring, quiet, and and frequent student corrections of board work.

Main concern

Hard-to-hear lectures, unclear explanations, and mountains of .

What students said

“The mountainous pile of hw assigned weekly made it almost impossible to have other classes to attend to.”
MATH096
“Nice, but cant teach!!”
MATH96
“ so that everyone can hear what he's talking about.”
MATH96

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often described as hard and picky, with little student-friendly exam structure mentioned.

Hard testsPoints docked for detailsMakeup tests sometimes allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and hard to understand, with .

Hard testsPick points offMakeup tests possible
“it is so hard to pass tests-BEWARE!! !!”
MATH96
“ because it seams that he cuts and pastes like 4 different tests together.”
MATH95

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can help it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 in-person reviews, highlighting weak teaching clarity and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Clarity

28/100

“ , and assigns a TON of homework.”

📚

22/100

“The mountainous pile of hw assigned weekly made it almost impossible to have other classes to attend to.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ if u can help it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Nice, but cant teach!!
  • Sounds like Hank from king of the hill. Difficult to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Workload

  • assigns a TON of homework
  • Tons of homework and is very boring
  • 5 hours of class eequals 10 hours of homework!

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • he's a . tho.
  • He is a good teacher but can be hard to understand at times.
  • This teacher has his heart in the right place, but his classes are sooooooo boring!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

23 detailed older in-person reviews show consistent themes on teaching and workload, but all are pre-2012.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 58
2 out of 510
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH965 reviews
MATH954 reviews
MATH0952 reviews
MATH0962 reviews
MATH382 reviews
Show 7 more courses
TRIG1012 reviews
MATH0321 review
MATH0351 review
MATH321 review
MATHMATH1 review
TRIG1041 review
TRIGMATH1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values