AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Maria Graciela

CBTE114 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless and handle a poorly documented course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear SyllabusSlow CommunicationSurprise FinalDisorganized Course
  • The only review gives a quality rating of 1 for poor syllabus clarity.
  • Students faced last-minute material and software requirements never taught earlier.
  • Response time to questions was described as about a week.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

45/100

Difficulty was mid-level, but .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content itself was not called advanced, but .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The sole student reported major organization failures and a quality score of 1.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; the complaint focused on organization rather than grade harshness.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Surprise audio CDs, CDRs, and a .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Syllabus problems, slow replies, and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

requiring student-provided media files.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One student reported a , and a final project using tools never covered in class.

Main concern

and weak course organization.

What students said

“Syllabus not written well; had several questions and it took her a week to get back to me.”
CBTE114

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

earlier, not a traditional proctored exam.

Project FinalUntaught Tools

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

pictures and audio files never covered beforehand.

Project FinalWin Movie MakerSurprise Requirements
“ in the course prior, and you need pictures and audio files to complete project.”
CBTE114

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Syllabus not written well; had several questions and it took her a week to get back to me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting organization and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Course Organization

18/100

“Syllabus not written well; had several questions and it took her a week to get back to me.”

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Professor QUALITY rating: 1”

🎬

40/100

“ in the course prior”

Theme 1

📋 About Course Setup

  • Syllabus not written well
  • it took her a week to get back to me
  • Two big surprises at the end

Theme 2

📝

  • in the course prior
  • you need pictures and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only one negative review from 2011 with no corroborating ratings or grade data.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CBTE1141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values