AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Marie Ambrose

NUTR150 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can focus only on this class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCut-throat gradingTextbook-heavy testsUnhelpful answersBoring lecturesPlays favorites
  • lectures
  • Students report hard work for C or worse and
  • Multiple comments call her unresponsive and uncompassionate

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students report working hard for a C or getting a , so an A takes serious grind.

All evidence is from in-person NUTR150 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content and , and misaligned with what students think they learned.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students would rather not have taken her and call her not much of a teacher.

Recommendation tone .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students describe cut-throat grading, favorites, and low grades despite effort.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Hard work is required to pass, but comments do not describe constant weekly overload.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Lectures feel boring and book-driven, and questions often go unanswered in useful ways.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and textbook reading.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person NUTR150 feels cut-throat, lecture-boring, and .

Main concern

Unclear expectations and harsh or .

What students said

“when it came to the tests, they were to see if you were just reading the text instead of ”
NUTR150
“I had to work really hard to pass her class I barley got a C”
NUTR150
“Everything about this class is so cut throat”
NUTR150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, which students find unfair.

Textbook-based testsDetail-heavy questions

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and fine details rather than confirming understanding from lecture.

Textbook-based testsDetail-heavy questions
“tests, they were to see if you were just reading the text instead of ”
NUTR150
“She wants details but never tells you on what”
NUTR150

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was not very much of a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and test-alignment themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She was not very much of a teacher.”

⚖️

25/100

“She favors!!!!!!!!”

📚 Test Alignment

32/100

“tests, they were to see if you were just reading the text instead of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was not very much of a teacher
  • She used the book a lot for lecture and made the class very boring
  • every time I had a question for her, she didn't follow-up on the actual question

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I had to work really hard to pass her class I barley got a C
  • and yet i got a D
  • Everything about this class is so cut throat

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed but very old in-person reviews (2003-2011) are directionally consistent yet limited in sample size and recency.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NUTR1505 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values