AI Rate Professor

English

Medha Moharir

ENGLISH51 · ENGLISH205 · ENGL205SUB · ENGL51 · ENG51 · ENG52 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you have no alternative and already write well independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandHarsh graderRude in classEssay-heavy EnglishAvoid if possible
  • Nearly every review attacks communication, accent clarity, and classroom tone.
  • As are rare; students say creativity is punished and .
  • Workload is not huge, but stress and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students repeatedly say she withholds As and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is mainly essays and prompts, but and should.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

Some students say she never takes roll and lectures often do not connect to the essays.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Almost all reviews .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many students report Cs and Bs with almost no As, .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

Assignment count is not huge, but essays and stress still dominate the experience.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students overwhelmingly describe her as hard to understand, rude, and ineffective.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

and format focus rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English classes are widely described as , and poorly explained, with and stingy.

Main concern

Accent barriers, public put-downs, and refusal to award As dominate the experience.

What students said

“poor quality of communication, can't speak to well to the class and treats you like a five year old.”
ENG101
“she doesn't believe in giving As.”
ENG101
“She degrades her students and even told one girl in front of the class that ".”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essay grading more than formal exams, with .

Essay-based gradingMLA focusLittle useful exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize essay prompts and .

Multiple essaysMLA-heavy gradingConfusing paper feedback
“all .”
ENG101
“5 long Essays.”
ENGL205SUB

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She doesnt offer any help when she assigns and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 in-person reviews with highly consistent , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Disaster

16/100

“She's pretty much the . In my Life .”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ !”

⚖️ Grade Wall

18/100

“She barely even speaks english and is completely unfair with because she doesnt believe in As”

Theme 1

🗣️ About Communication

  • Her accent makes it almost impossible to understand what she's saying
  • You can't understand a word she says or writes on the board.
  • Can't even speak english.

Theme 2

📝

  • she doesn't believe in giving As.
  • none of them got me an A.
  • Trying to be creative with

Theme 3

😡 About Classroom Tone

  • She degrades her students
  • She is constantly yelling at her class
  • she prejudges people

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine highly consistent negative reviews across several years strongly reinforce the same communication and .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 520

Course coverage

ENG10119 reviews
ENG512 reviews
ENGLISH512 reviews
511 review
ENG521 review
Show 4 more courses
ENGL2051 review
ENGL205SUB1 review
ENGL511 review
ENGLISH2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values