AI Rate Professor

Geographic Information Systems

Kim Mathis

GEOG110 · GISG110 · GIS110 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend, do homework, and if you need strong beginner coaching.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPowerPoint-heavy lecturesFair graderAttendance-focusedClear when preparedFinal map project
  • Lectures are often read from PowerPoint and if you show up and participate.
  • and homework; grades feel fair when you put in the work.
  • and participation, and the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

You can score well if you do homework, participate, and study reviews, but the and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is manageable with homework and reviews, yet students call it hard and say mapping skills may not stick without extra work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and , so skipping hurts grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and clear lectures, while and is weak for true beginners.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students report , and exams drawn from reviews and homework.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

effort, especially near the end of term.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Mixed reports of and limited help on hard GIS questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades mix homework, participation, midterm and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person GIS classes mix clear, fair teaching with PowerPoint-heavy delivery, strict attendance focus, and a .

Main concern

Beginners may struggle if lectures feel unhelpful on deeper GIS questions and you skip class.

What students said

“Kim is a good teacher. She is easy to understand, as well as clear and concise during lecture.”
GISG110
“Teacher .”
GIS110
“Reads you her powerpoint every class--but so you must show if grades matter to you.”
GISG110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Midterm and and homework, with a separate final map project.

Questions from PowerPoint reviewsHomework-aligned examsFinal map presentation

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework; map presentation is graded separately.

PowerPoint review examsHomework-based questionsFinal map presentation
“Midterm and and homework.”
GISG110
“A and it takes a lot of time and effort.”
GIS110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kim is a good teacher. She is easy to understand, as well as clear and concise during lecture. She grades fairly and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews (2008-2010), highlighting lecture style, attendance, and assessment; credibility: Medium.

📚 Lecture Clarity

58/100

“She is easy to understand, as well as clear and concise during lecture.”

📅

28/100

“Reads you her powerpoint every class--but so you must show if grades matter to you.”

📝

62/100

“Midterm and and homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • easy to understand, as well as clear and concise during lecture
  • She read from PowerPoint almost verbatim
  • teaching was logical and she is very well prepared

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's hard, no question. But if and put in a lot of effort you should do fine
  • grades fairly and
  • Got all high scores during class but was still unable to make a map by the end

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews from 2008-2010 show mixed but concrete themes; sample is small and dated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GISG1103 reviews
GEOG1101 review
GIS1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values