AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Sara Clowery

ANTHR102 · ANTH101 · ANTH102 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Good choice for Anthro if you use study guides, keep up with lectures and readings, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful study guidesFriendly and availableExtra credit saves gradesLecture-focusedChallenging tests
  • Students like her friendly manner, study guides, and willingness to help and allow makeups.
  • Tests can be hard, but , and make an A realistic.
  • A minority finds the course very hard and writing-heavy, especially if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with notes, practice quizzes, and , but skipping study can mean a .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Many find it manageable with guides, while others call it very hard and writing-intensive.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews ; success is framed more around lectures, notes, and studying.

All evidence is from in-person reviews only; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

guides, and grade recovery options.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and papers let students recover from poor exams.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Primate paper, chapter readings, and but not crushing load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

about high challenge.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of midterms, finals, papers, quizzes, and optional .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and fair recovery options; difficulty spikes if you ignore readings or papers.

Main concern

Midterms and and can feel English-heavy.

What students said

“super friendly and pleasant. sticks to lecture, interesting videos in class. ”
ANTH102
“Got an because I didn't study at all but finished her class with an A .”
ANTH102
“Extremely helpful teacher but the class is extremely challenging.”
ANTHR102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are challenging but aided by printed study guides and ; recovery via is common.

Study guidesOnline practice quizzesChallenging midterms and finalsExtra credit paper

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice quizzes; falling behind on readings hurts midterms and finals.

Printed study guidesPractice quizzesChallenging exams
“ ”
ANTH102
“memorize the answers on the ”
ANTH102
“keep up with you in the ass during the midterm and .”
ANTHR102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“super friendly and pleasant. sticks to lecture, interesting videos in class. and always makes herself available to students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting support, study tools, and ; credibility: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Support

76/100

“always makes herself available to students. I missed a and she let me make it up.”

🅰️ Grade Recovery

68/100

“finished her class with an A .”

📈

52/100

“Extremely helpful teacher but the class is extremely challenging.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • super friendly and pleasant
  • A great teacher. while using blackboard.
  • Extremely helpful teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but with good notes and studying an A is possible.
  • finished her class with an A
  • very hard and it's more like an english class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six mostly detailed in-person reviews from 2008-2010 give a coherent picture but a limited sample.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH1023 reviews
ANTH1012 reviews
ANTHR1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values