AI Rate Professor

Science

Deborah Brueggeman

RAD120 · RADT · RADT243 · RADT242 · RADT120A · RADIOLOGYPHYSI · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid if you have a choice; expect , and a combative classroom tone.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTrick QuestionsHarsh ExamsNever Wrong AttitudeHigh Stakes DetailMath Confusion
  • Students consistently report trick questions and .
  • Content is already hard and becomes harder under her style and .
  • Almost no positive teaching praise; many warn future students and wish they had another option.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students describe trick tests, no-formula math, and a sense she thrives on failing people, making high grades feel nearly unreachable.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Radiology physics and related content are repeatedly called the most challenging courses with constant detail mastery required.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students must sign participation and sign-out logs or , so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Nearly every detailed review warns students off or says there is no choice but to endure her.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and exams that feel designed to fail students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students must read and reread every chapter, never fall behind, and use tutors for math support.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Comments focus on trickery, vague or over-specific tests, and an inflexible .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Quizzes and and trick questions frequently mentioned.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

her testing style, with trick questions and strict participation rules.

Main concern

, and a demoralizing never-wrong teaching stance.

What students said

“A difficult subject made even more difficult.”
RADT120A
“She likes to trick students in any ways that she can.”
RAD120
“ . Very vague or over specific.”
RADT

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as intentionally tricky, vague or over-specific, and often cover unlectured material.

Trick QuestionsUnlectured MaterialDetail-Heavy Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , and material not always covered in lecture.

Trick QuestionsUnlectured MaterialDetail-Heavy Quizzes
“ . Tests are made to trip you up.”
RADT
“The and , and I think she thrives on failing people.”
RADT120A
“ ..good luck”
RADT243

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DONT WISH THIS INSTRUCTOR ON MY WORSE FRIEND”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 , and extreme difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Harsh Teaching Tone

18/100

“DONT WISH THIS INSTRUCTOR ON MY WORSE FRIEND”

🧩

15/100

“ . Very vague or over specific.”

📚 Extreme Difficulty

15/100

“A difficult subject made even more difficult.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A difficult subject made even more difficult.
  • .
  • I think she thrives on failing people.

Theme 2

🧪

  • She likes to trick students in any ways that she can.
  • .
  • Expect the .

Theme 3

😤 About Character

  • She's never wrong, no matter what, according to her.
  • She's number teacher on my list counting from the bottom up.
  • This is the only place she has any power in her life so she likes to use it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

9 consistent in-person reviews from 2004-2010 strongly agree on harsh testing, though all are older with no recent updates.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

RADT120A4 reviews
RAD1201 review
RADIOLOGYPHYSI1 review
RADT1 review
RADT2421 review
Show 1 more courses
RADT2431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values