AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Henry Silvaaa

ACC116 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

; treat this professor as largely unknown and verify with current classmates if possible.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSparse EvidenceSingle RatingAccountingNo Written FeedbackModerate Difficulty Signal
  • Only one old rating exists with no written comment.
  • Quality 4 and difficulty 3 suggest average-to-solid experience, not proven excellence.
  • Students cannot rely on peer detail for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

No grade outcomes or effort comments exist, so Easy A cannot be supported.

All evidence is from one in-person review with no written comment.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty 3 alone implies standard challenge without qualitative detail.

All evidence is from one in-person review with no written comment.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available rating.

All evidence is from one in-person review with no written comment.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

A single quality-4 score is mildly positive but .

All evidence is from one in-person review with no written comment.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

.

Format shift

All evidence is from one in-person review with no written comment.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is unreported beyond a mid-range difficulty score.

Format shift

All evidence is from one in-person review with no written comment.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Only a quality rating of 4 with .

Format shift

All evidence is from one in-person review with no written comment.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Assessment mix is not described in reviews.

Format shift

All evidence is from one in-person review with no written comment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person ACC116 rating gives quality 4 and difficulty 3 with no comment text.

Main concern

No student .

What students said

“No Comments”
ACC116

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No Comments”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with no written comment. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Evidence Gap

15/100

“No Comments”

🎯 Teaching Quality Signal

58/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

📝

  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

15/100

Evidence confidence

One 2009 rating with no comment body offers almost no detail, consistency check, or recency.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACC1161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values