AI Rate Professor

Art History

Patricia Mannix

ARTF110 · ARTF111 · ART111 · ART100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

; students uniformly call the experience a waste of time.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear LecturesRudeAvoid At All CostsLate Grading
  • Every review rates her a 1 with zero positive comments.
  • , and .
  • Students warn she delays grades and is confrontational.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

High difficulty ratings and warnings of low grades show an A requires heavy struggle with little clarity on expectations.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call material and lectures confusing, with difficulty ratings often 3 to 5 and constant frustration.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every comment urges students to stay away, calling her the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Delayed grades, refused to grade some work, and students expect low outcomes.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report , and high difficulty without payoff.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Consistent reports of and confrontational style.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention tests, assignments, and but do not define a .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and delayed grading across art foundation courses.

Main concern

Disorganization and and grades unpredictable.

What students said

“Absolutely the . She is all over the grid. and lectures and unclear and vague.”
ARTF110
“ . You will be in tears the entire semester. She's horrible.”
ARTF111
“What was she talking about? She was speaking another language. This class so disorganized.”
ART111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; and unclear deadlines, so exams feel punitive rather than friendly.

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; hours and deadlines were unclear.

Unclear DeadlinesShort Test Windows
“gives deadlines that aren't clear on the website, and in the a.m.”
ARTF111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely the . She is all over the grid. Disorganized, rude and lectures and unclear and vague. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting unanimous negative themes in teaching and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Disaster

8/100

“ and long. PLEASE RECONSIDER NOW and DONT!!!”

🚫

5/100

“ !!! IF YOU !!!”

📁 Disorganization

15/100

“ and when you ask for clarification, repeats the same vague crap again and again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was speaking another language. This class so disorganized.
  • Boring woman who doesn't understand how to use a computer
  • and long.

Theme 2

😠 About Attitude

  • and she's very rude.
  • She's not friendly at all and likes to be confrontive.
  • . AVOID!

Theme 3

📉 About Grades & Experience

  • She even delayed the posting of the grades and that messed up student transfers.
  • .
  • I JUST WASTED MY TIME AND ENERGY IN THIS CLASS!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven consistently negative reviews over several years agree on quality issues, but all are older (2006-2009) with no grades reported.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ARTF1114 reviews
ART1001 review
ART1111 review
ARTF1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values