AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Domingo David

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Good online pick if and will stay on top of homework and peer comments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAccessible on CanvasExtra Quiz ChancesLong Project WindowsLots of HomeworkGroup Projects
  • Single strong online review praises kindness and fast Canvas help.
  • but deadlines are long and .
  • Group comment participation is required and easy to forget.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Student earned an A with extra quiz chances and long project time, but tags still flag lots of homework.

All evidence is from one online review; no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty rated 4 with and projects, so content is not light.

All evidence is from one online review; no in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

.

All evidence is from one online review; no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Would take again with quality 5 and strong praise for kindness, access, and flexible completion windows.

All evidence is from one online review; no in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Extra quiz opportunities and long project windows make completion and recovery more forgiving.

Format shift

Based on one online review.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Tags and comments emphasize lots of .

Format shift

Based on one online review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Described as very nice, accessible outside class, and .

Format shift

Based on one online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and long projects rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Based on one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online CS-style course with kind Canvas support, , and .

Main concern

Lots of homework and easy-to-miss peer comment requirements.

What students said

“when I need help I could just send canvas mail, and .”
11413

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes allow extra completion chances and projects have long windows; no strict proctoring mentioned.

Extra Quiz OpportunitiesLong Project WindowsCanvas Messaging Help

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online , and long project timelines supported via Canvas mail.

Extra Quiz OpportunitiesLong Project WindowsCanvas Help
“give a lot of extra opportunities to complete the quiz, the time for each project are very long, .”
11413

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The professor is very nice, when I need help I could just send canvas mail, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“The professor is very nice, when I need help I could just send canvas mail, and .”

📚 Workload

30/100

“Lots of homework”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“give a lot of extra opportunities to complete the long”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The professor is very nice
  • Accessible outside class
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • the time for each project are very long, .
  • give a lot of extra opportunities to complete the quiz

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent online review, so but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

114131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values