AI Rate Professor

Film & Television

Alexandra Lacey

D020 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle unclear , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderConfusing InstructionsHeavy PapersLecture HeavyMandatory Attendance
  • Most students describe the class as , and .
  • and writing-heavy even when some students still earn A grades.
  • All analyzed evidence is from in-person classes, with no online review data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments , and unclear requirements that make the A costly.

All evidence comes from 14 in-person reviews; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The content may not be advanced, but students say the class becomes difficult because assignments and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

as mandatory, and students often describe class time as boring or low value.

online comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

Most students warn against taking the class because of , and stressful workload.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or and describe nitpicking writing details.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews , and mentally draining work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students commonly describe lectures, emails, Canvas pages, and assignment instructions as .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus mostly on , and some quizzes or final questions.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly negative, mainly , and heavy writing.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“RUN.”
00866
“I really don't think this person should be teaching.”
D020
“ assignments but expects so many things.”
00866

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a final and quizzes, but they do not .

Final MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Final MentionedQuizzes MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Several answers are also just straight up incorrect on the final.”
00866
“Told us to buy a textbook but it was only used for quizzes and nothing else, waste of money.”
00866

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“TERRIBLE. Her lectures and instructions are tedious and confusing.”

⚖️

10/100

“she's a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“She expects students to do a lot, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Reads off slides every class, extremely boring, and laughs at students in a .
  • Doesn't .
  • Does not help students, mumbles, reads off screen, deflects questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she's a .
  • and over just because she doesn't like your writing.
  • I remember I got a 0 for not putting my name in MLA format, she never told us to do that.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload

  • This class is literally just an English class in secret.
  • 4 hours of wasted time watching youtube videos and listening to boring lectures.
  • Videos are interesting at first, but you will soon find the class mentally draining and sometimes pointless.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen recent reviews are detailed and highly consistent, with only one strongly positive outlier.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 512

Course coverage

0086611 reviews
D0203 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1