AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Ethnic Studies

David Palaita

NAIS31 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take this class if you want an easy grade and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardVery easy classReading heavyParticipation mattersClear gradingEssay exams
  • The only review gives a perfect quality rating and reports an A in a very easy class.
  • The , and essay midterm and final.
  • because it is described as a lot and tedious.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

The student earned an A and calls the class very easy, though discussions, quizzes, essays, and .

All evidence comes from the online review; there is no in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The student directly calls the class very easy, with the .

All course easiness evidence comes from the online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and the review says three in-person meetings make up a lot of the grade.

The only evidence is from an online-listed hybrid review with required in-person meetings.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

The and reports an easy A with .

Recommendation evidence is online only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

An A, , and a very easy class description suggest lenient grading with participation requirements.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The class is easy but , and a lot of tedious reading.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from the online review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

The review gives a perfect quality rating and describes the course structure as clear and easy.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from the online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and essay midterm and final.

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from the online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online evidence describes a very easy hybrid-style class with , and .

Main concern

though the class is easy.

What students said

“Very easy class but the and gets very tedious.”
NAIS31
“The rest of your grade is dependent on weekly discussions post and and .”
NAIS31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The midterm and final are essays, which sounds student-friendly, but proctoring and .

Essay MidtermEssay FinalSmall QuizzesExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review says the midterm and final are essays, but does not .

Essay MidtermEssay FinalSmall QuizzesExam policy not clearly proven
“plus the Midterm and .”
NAIS31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very easy class but the and gets very tedious.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in difficulty, workload, and assessment. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Very easy class but the and gets very tedious.”

📈 Grade Path

88/100

“The rest of your grade is dependent on weekly discussions post and and .”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“the and gets very tedious.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy class but the and gets very tedious.
  • The rest of your grade is dependent on weekly discussions post and and .

Theme 2

📝 About Assessment Style

  • only 3 in-person meetings that makes up a lot of your grade.
  • plus the Midterm and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is detailed but not broadly confirmed.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NAIS311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values