AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Ethnic Studies

Nathaniel Tan

CETH10 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want an inspiring class with fair grading, , and a very realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterInspirationalEasy AExtra creditCaringGood feedback
  • and in-person formats.
  • Grades are very favorable because essays, projects, and make high scores realistic.
  • Online work has more reading and writing, while and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Students repeatedly report A or A+ grades, , fair grading, and if completed.

, while online evidence is still favorable but includes more reading and essays.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Students describe the class as easy, chill, and manageable, with lectures, documentaries, essays, and .

In-person reviews make the course sound easiest, while online reviews add that reading and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Several reviews mark attendance as mandatory, but some online reviews mark it as not mandatory and one in-person comment .

Online attendance evidence varies, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and gives a realistic path to high grades.

Both formats are positive, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

Students mention A+ grades, , fair grading, and 100s for completed essays.

Format shift

, while online reviews also support fair grading and strong feedback.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The course is easy overall, but weekly discussions, reading, essays, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize reading and essays, while and manageable group projects.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students describe him as caring, inspiring, knowledgeable, responsive, and .

Format shift

Both formats support strong teaching, with in-person reviews sounding especially enthusiastic.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades appear centered on essays, discussions, group projects, presentations, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions and essays, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are highly enthusiastic, describing easy grading, inspiring lectures, , and meaningful discussions.

Main concern

Participation and , but students still find the course easy.

What students said

“Easy A.”
CETH10
“He truly cares about his students.”
CETH10
“I loved every second of it.”
CETH10

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are positive, with and easy contact, though students mention , and essays.

Main concern

Reading and if ignored.

What students said

“ .”
CETH10
“pretty chill class, the course consisted of weekly discussions and five essays.”
CETH10
“try to stay on top of it, it definitely builds up since there's a lot of reading involved”
CETH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe essays, discussions, and group projects, and they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam rules, or .

No Clear Exam PolicyEssaysGroup ProjectsDiscussions

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and documentaries, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, midterm, final, or proctoring rules.

EssaysGroup ProjectsNo Clear Exam Evidence
“There are a few essays but he gives 100 if you just do it.”
CETH10
“Only 3 essays total and 2 group projects for the in-person class.”
CETH10

Online

Online reviews mention discussions, essays, reading, and feedback, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Weekly DiscussionsEssaysNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“the course consisted of weekly discussions and five essays.”
CETH10
“ .”
CETH10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing, inspiring professor! He truly cares about his students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“He truly cares about his students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“I had no idea what the class was gonna be about but I loved every second of it.”

📈 Grade Effort

94/100

“Easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing, inspiring professor!
  • Prof Tan is a great teacher and
  • He is super knowledgeable and very nice.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There are a few essays but he gives 100 if you just do it.
  • Lots of .
  • Also an easy A+

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • pretty chill class, the course consisted of weekly discussions and five essays.
  • Only 3 essays total and 2 group projects for the in-person class.
  • try to stay on top of it, it definitely builds up since there's a lot of reading involved

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Seven very recent reviews across online and , and detailed course descriptions.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CETH107 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 5 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values