AI Rate Professor

Design Technology

Brett Magnuson

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can thrive with harsh critique and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh CriticVague DirectionsSlow EmailsFrustrating Animation Feedback
  • Very tough and
  • Instructions often vague and need repeated clarification
  • High difficulty with poor perceived support

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

yet still getting nowhere under tough critique.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Rated extremely hard with and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Overall tone , and responsiveness.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Described as tough in a demoralizing way with little positive reinforcement.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

High difficulty and repeated rework imply a heavy effort load.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Vague speech, slow emails, and unhelpful critique define the experience.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

exams.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and demoralizing with slow communication.

Main concern

and little praise can stall progress.

What students said

“He never says anything good about your work. Doesn't answer emails promptly.”
4219

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be and not get anywhere.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting harsh feedback and poor clarity. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“As for clarity, he speaks like a teenager, so he sounds very vague”

⚖️

15/100

“He never says anything good about your work.”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“Be and not get anywhere.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • speaks like a teenager, so he sounds very vague
  • I had to ask him several times to clarify

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Magnuson was tough
  • and not get anywhere

Theme 3

📧 About Communication

  • Doesn't answer emails promptly
  • never says anything good about your work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2014 in-person review with strong negative detail but no corroborating samples.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

42191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values