AI Rate Professor

Design Technology

Kevin Gorman

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

with industry exposure and flexible attendance.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirationalKind and supportiveIndustry guestsFun projectsParticipation matters
  • Students praise kindness, support, and real industry guest access.
  • and cartoon sound.
  • .
  • Only one review, but it is highly detailed and glowing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

, and an A+ suggest high grades are realistic with engaged participation.

Evidence comes only from one In person review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Mid difficulty with .

Evidence comes only from one In person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

95/100

The .

Evidence comes only from one In person review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Student would take again and describes him as great, kind, and highly supportive.

Evidence comes only from one In person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

A+ outcome and success-focused support imply lenient, student-friendly grading.

Format shift

In person-only evidence.

Workload

Light

75/100

Fun projects and guest sessions sound engaging rather than overwhelming.

Format shift

In person-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

and strong student support.

Format shift

In person-only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on fun group projects and participation, not exams.

Format shift

In person-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

who wants students to succeed through fun projects and biweekly industry guests.

Main concern

Participation matters for the full experience.

What students said

“Prof. Gorman is a great professor with kind character. He really wants his students to succeed.”
1813

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe project work and guests rather than proctored exams, making assessment feel student-friendly.

Project-basedNo textbooksGuest sessions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; focus is fun projects and industry guest Q&A.

Fun projectsIndustry guestsParticipation matters
“He gave us plenty of .”
1813

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Gorman is a great professor with kind character. He really wants his students to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting kindness, projects, and industry guests. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Prof. Gorman is a great professor with kind character. He really wants his students to succeed.”

🎤 Industry Access

90/100

“he brough different guests from the industry every 2 weeks, and we had many opportunities to ask them questions.”

❤️ About Character

95/100

“he is just a great and kind person, and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really wants his students to succeed.
  • plenty of
  • Inspirational

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • kind character
  • great and kind person
  • very supportive

Theme 3

🏢 About Industry Exposure

  • different guests from the industry every 2 weeks
  • many opportunities to ask them questions
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Single detailed positive review is rich but too thin for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

18131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values