AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Eric McClure

CHEM11 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Avoid unless you already know chemistry well and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderConfusing lecturesLots of homeworkTest heavySelf-study required
  • Most students say and force heavy self-teaching from the textbook.
  • , late lab grades, and little .
  • A and a strong chemist, but still advise taking someone else.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even the A student needed curves, drops, and .

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Average difficulty is about 4.6 with constant complaints about intense load and advanced expectations.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory, with only one saying it was not.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Take-again rate is 0% and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tagged tough grader repeatedly; and are rare.

Format shift

Based on seven in-person reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

, and pop quizzes create a heavy grind.

Format shift

Based on seven in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

and say they had to learn everything alone.

Format shift

Based on seven in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple midterms, test-heavy tags, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

Based on seven in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person chem11 students consistently report confusing , and a .

Main concern

, and lectures that .

What students said

“ . 4 midterms, insane question wording.”
chem11
“ and bad at explaining concepts.”
chem11
“Good chemist, awful teacher. unless you have a good knowledge of chemistry.”
chem11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and hard with ; curves and , but friendliness is still low.

4 midtermsTough wordingPop quizzesACS finalTest heavyCurves and drops

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report four midterms with , and a final from ACS material.

4 midtermsInsane question wordingPop quizzesACS finalCurves and dropped grades
“ . 4 midterms, insane question wording.”
chem11
“ and mostly come from the textbook with rewording.”
chem11
“The from his, so keep practicing ACS!!”
chem11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please stay away.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 , and heavy load. Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Teaching Problems

22/100

“ and bad at explaining concepts.”

⚖️

15/100

“ is insanely harsh.”

📚 Heavy Workload

12/100

“His course load is intense and gives 4 assignments per week (lab, two activities per week, homework) which I feel is too much.”

👎

12/100

“ if you can!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and bad at explaining concepts
  • I had to
  • his teaching methods feel old-school and information is hard to retain

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 4 midterms, insane question wording
  • I didn't do well on exams but still earned a low A , and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Load

  • Lots of homework
  • gives 4 assignments per week
  • Labs worth 25%, 1/13 graded a week before the end

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed in-person reviews over several months are and weak lecturing.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

chem117 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 6