AI Rate Professor

Business

Lisa Solana

JOUR135 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid JOUR-135 unless you have no alternative and can teach yourself the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAI-generated lecturesRobotic presenceWaste of timeGroup projectsLow effort
  • Students describe lectures and slides as fully AI-generated
  • Class feels impersonal and bragging-focused rather than instructional
  • Zero interest in retaking and quality ratings stuck at 1

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Difficulty reports are mixed and , but students do not describe an easy A path.

All evidence is from in-person JOUR-135 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content itself is not framed as advanced, yet poor delivery makes the experience unrewarding.

All evidence is from in-person JOUR-135 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

All evidence is from in-person JOUR-135 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students call the class a waste of time and .

All evidence is from in-person JOUR-135 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades are not the main complaint; delivery quality and AI-generated content dominate reviews.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Group projects and participation are mentioned, but .

Format shift

Workload notes come only from in-person JOUR-135.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students say she feels robotic, brags about herself, and relies on fully AI-generated slides and lectures.

Format shift

Both in-person reviews rate quality at 1.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Participation and group projects are tagged, but .

Format shift

Assessment specifics are limited in in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person JOUR-135 is widely seen as low-effort, AI-heavy, and emotionally disconnected from students.

Main concern

Lectures feel machine-made and disrespectful, so classroom time may not teach much.

What students said

“The whole class is AI generated, actual waste of time of a class, don't bother taking it.”
JOUR-135
“she felt non human like a robot and class was not human”
JOUR-135

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The whole class is AI generated, actual waste of time of a class, don't bother taking it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting AI-generated content and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🚨 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Genuinely disrespectful to us students who took the class expecting our professor to put in just as much effort”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“don't bother taking it.”

🤖 Classroom Presence

12/100

“she felt non human like a robot and class was not human”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The whole class is AI generated
  • plethora of and lectures
  • her bragging about her accomplishments

Theme 2

💔 About Respect & Effort

  • actual waste of time of a class
  • class was not human
  • don't bother taking it

Theme 3

📌 About Course Setup

  • Participation matters
  • Group projects

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two same-day low-quality reviews exist, both highly negative, with .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

JOUR-1352 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1